Abstract. A major challenge to the Doctrine of Double Effect (DDE) is the
concern that an agent's intention can be identified in such a fine-grained way as to eliminate an intention to harm from a putative example of an intended harm
, and yet, the resulting case appears to be a case of impermissibility.
What is the primary criticism of the doctrine of double effect?
Critics of the principle of double effect claim that the pattern of justification used in these cases has some shared conditions:
the agent acts in order to promote a good end, shows adequate respect for the value of human life in so acting
, and has attempted to avoid or minimize the harm in question.
What is a problem for the Doctrine of Double Effect quizlet?
1)
The act must be good, or at least morally neutral
(independently of its consequences) Doctrine of Double Effect – Condition Two. 2) The agent intends only the good effect. The bad effect may be foreseen, tolerated and permitted, but it must not be intended.
What is the purpose of the doctrine of double effect?
The Principle of Double Effect. This principle aims to
provide specific guidelines for determining when it is morally permissible to perform an action in pursuit of a good end in full knowledge that the action will also bring about bad results
.
How does the Trolley Problem illustrate the doctrine of the double effect?
If the outcome for five people is good and the outcome is bad for one
, the action is justified, permissible and even obligatory. That gnawing little feeling you get in the back of your head when you consider the consequences of pushing a man in front of a trolley is expressed in the Doctrine of Double Effect.
Which of the following is an example of the doctrine of double effect?
Abortions when the mother's life is in danger
In cases
when saving the life of a pregnant woman causes the death of her unborn child – for example, performing an abortion when continuing the pregnancy would risk killing the mother – some people argue that this is a case of the doctrine of double effect.
What is the most serious difficulty with the doctrine of double effect quizlet?
you are sometimes permitted to foreseeably cause certain harms, even though you may not intend to cause those harms. all of the above. What is the most serious difficulty with the Doctrine of Double Effect? this
generates a contradiction
, which refutes the claim that both rules are absolute.
What is the rule of double effect?
Although variously formulated, the traditional rule of double effect specifies that
an action with 2 possible effects, one good and one bad, is morally permitted if the action
: (1) is not in itself immoral, (2) is undertaken only with the intention of achieving the possible good effect, without intending the possible …
Is the Doctrine of Double Effect legal?
The legal irrelevance of the doctrine of double effect
Knowingly to bring about the death of another is legally and morally problematic
; usually it is a serious wrong.
Is the doctrine of double effect irrelevant in end of life decision making?
Here, bringing about a satisfactory dying process for a patient is a good effect, not a bad one. What matters is that patients die without pain and suffering. This marks a crucial departure from the double-effect doctrine;
if the patient's death is not a bad effect then the doctrine is clearly irrelevant
.
What Utilitarianism means?
Utilitarianism is
a theory of morality that advocates actions that foster happiness or pleasure and oppose actions that cause unhappiness or harm
. When directed toward making social, economic, or political decisions, a utilitarian philosophy would aim for the betterment of society as a whole.
What is an example of the rule of double effect RDE )?
Several historical misapplications of the RDE provide easy targets for opponents of double effect, while misguiding those who are in support of its use. For example, proponents of RDE who
are opposed to abortion have attempted to use double effect to justify operating on a tubal ectopic pregnancy
.
What is the double effect in medicine?
The doctrine of double effect states that
a harmful effect of treatment, even resulting in death
, is permissible if it is not intended and occurs as a side effect of a beneficial action.
What is the double effect in natural law?
This doctrine says that
if doing something morally good has a morally bad side-effect it's ethically OK to do it providing the bad side-effect wasn't intended
. This is true even if you foresaw that the bad effect would probably happen.
What is the answer to the trolly problem?
Foot's own response to the Trolley Problem was that
the morally justified action would be to steer the trolley to kill the one workman, thus saving a net four lives
. In order to demonstrate the morality of this, she made a distinction between what she called ‘negative duties' and ‘positive duties'.
What is the Trolley Problem utilitarianism?
The trolley thought experiment has a fundamental purpose. … The trolley problem highlights a fundamental tension between two schools of moral thought. The utilitarian perspective dictates that
the most appropriate action is the one that achieves the greatest good for the greatest number
.
