It has always professed to abhor a merits review. The phrase anxious scrutiny reflects these attitudes. It
perpetuates the notion that scrutiny remains the task on which the court is engaged
, even when it is dealing with human or fundamental rights.
What is the meaning of Wednesbury?
A reasoning or decision
is Wednesbury unreasonable (or irrational) if it is so unreasonable that no reasonable person acting reasonably could have made it (Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation (1948) 1 KB 223).
What is the anxious scrutiny test?
It has always professed to abhor a merits review. The phrase anxious scrutiny reflects these attitudes. It
perpetuates the notion that scrutiny remains the task on which the court is engaged
, even when it is dealing with human or fundamental rights.
What is super wednesbury test?
In cases involving matters of government policy or public expenditure, the courts are reluctant to intervene and tend to apply a
more stringent standard of unreasonableness
, referred to as super-Wednesbury.
Which case law is the classical example of unreasonableness?
C. Post-Wednesbury in Common law. These principles of Wednesbury unreasonableness underwent major modification through the course of decisions in England. A classic example would be the decision of Lord Diplock in the celebrated
case of Council of Civil Services Unions v.
What does procedural impropriety mean?
Procedural impropriety
This applies
where the public authority did not adhere to procedural requirements or breached Convention rights
. Public Authorities in the UK must act fairly and without bias (either actual or suspected). The court needs to be persuaded that there is a real risk of a decision being biased.
What is personal bias when a person sits as a judge and is?
If a judge or adjudicating authority is biased either in favour of one party or against the other,
he cannot be expected to do justice in the matter
. Such a person is disqualified from adjudicating and since such proceedings stand vitiated, any decision taken by him is liable to be set aside.
What is the test for unreasonableness?
His test has two limbs: ‘The court is entitled
to investigate the action of the local authority with a view to seeing
whether they have taken into account matters which they ought not to take into account, or conversely, have refused to take into account or neglected to take into account matters which they ought to …
What is Wednesbury principle of reasonableness?
v Wednesbury Corporation, it was held that
if the Decision on a competent matter is so unreasonable that no reasonable authority could ever come to it, then the courts can interfere
. It is not based on what the court considers unreasonable. Rather, it is a measured as a decision that a reasonable man wouldn't come to.
What is unreasonable ultra vires?
Substantive ultra vires means that
the rule making authority has no substantive power under the empowering act to make rules in question
. It refers to the scope, extent and range of power conferred by the parent statute to make delegated legislation.
What is the standard of correctness?
Correctness. Correctness is
the less deferential standard that a court can give to an administrative decision maker
. The court will give no deference at all and will judge the decision on the basis of whether it is correct in law. A court may substitute its own opinion for that of the decision maker.
Lest we forget what was actually said in 1948, Lord Greene stated: It is true to say that, if a decision on a competent matter is so unreasonable that no reasonable authority could ever have come to it, then
the courts can interfere
. … It is not what the court considers unreasonable, a different thing altogether.
The public authority would be said to have failed to exercise its discretion when:
There is an unlawful delegation of discretionary powers to other person when the statute states that such powers shall be exercised only by a particular public authority
.
What is procedural impropriety in judicial review?
A failure on the part of a public authority to act in accordance
with the requirements of procedural fairness and in compliance with the common-law rules of natural justice.
What is speaking order of court?
A speaking order means
an order speaking for itself
. To put it simply every order must contain reasons. Giving of reasons in support of an order is considered to be the third principle of natural justice; the other two being.
What do you mean by ultra vires?
Ultra vires translates to ‘
beyond the powers
‘. It is used to describe an act which requires legal authority or power but is then completed outside of or without the requisite authority.
