Stimulus Generalization
2 After conditioning, Albert feared not just the white rat, but a wide variety of similar white objects as well. His fear included other furry objects including Raynor’s fur coat and Watson wearing a Santa Claus beard.
What did John B Watson do to Little Albert?
Albert was a 9-month-old baby who had not previously demonstrated any fear of rats. In the beginning of the experiment, when Albert was 11 months old, John Watson placed
a rat
(in addition to some other animals and objects with fur) on the table in front of Albert, who reacted with curiosity and no sign of fear.
What was it called when Little Albert learned to fear all furry things not just rats?
Stimulus Generalization
2 After conditioning, Albert feared not just the white rat, but a wide variety of similar white objects as well. His fear included other furry objects including Raynor’s fur coat and Watson wearing a Santa Claus beard.
What was Little Albert not afraid of?
Although he probably continued to fear
various furry objects
for a time, Albert would likely go on to experience extinction later in life, losing the mental association between furry objects and loud noises.
Did Little Albert develop a phobia?
Known as the Little Albert study, it is typically presented as
evidence for the role of classical conditioning in fear development
. Some critics, however, have noted deficiencies in the study that suggest that little or no fear conditioning actually occurred.
What was the conclusion of the Little Albert experiment?
In conclusion, Watson and Rayner concluded that their hypothesis was correct, and
they could condition “little Albert” to fear something irrational
. Although their experiment was riddled with third variables such as age and mental ability.
What are the ethical issues with the Little Albert experiment?
Unfortunately, one of the Little Albert experiment ethical issues was that
Little Albert was harmed during the experiment
. This is because he was classically conditioned to fear white rats, and such fear did not exist earlier in baby Albert. This could also have resulted in Albert suffering for his entire life.
What did Watson’s Little Albert experiment quizlet?
Terms in this set (2)
Watson & Rayner’s (1920) experiment on ‘Little Albert’ demonstrated that
classical conditioning principles could be applied to condition the emotional response of fear
.
What Happened to Baby Albert after testing?
Tragically, medical records showed that Douglas
had severe neurological problems and died at an early age of hydrocephalus, or water on the brain
. According to his records, this seems to have resulted in vision problems, so much so that at times he was considered blind.
What was the main point of Ivan Pavlov’s experiment with dogs?
In Pavlov’s experiment, the food was the unconditioned stimulus. An unconditioned response is an automatic response to a stimulus. The
dogs salivating for food
is the unconditioned response in Pavlov’s experiment. A conditioned stimulus is a stimulus that can eventually trigger a conditioned response.
What was the major criticism of the Little Albert experiment?
The experiment was not carefully designed or conducted, Little Albert’s Fears were not Objectively Measured, but were Subjectively Observed. The experiment was unethical because Watson and Raynor, did not extinguish Little Albert’s
Fear Response to furry animals and objects
.
What was the white rat in the Little Albert experiment?
In the Little Albert Experiment the white rat was
the conditioned stimulus
. Behavior which is similar (but not necessarily the same) to the UCR, which is triggered by the CS after classical conditioning. Conditioned responses are learned. E.g. fear when presentation with the white rat.
What happened after Little Albert was classically conditioned to fear a tame white rat?
Terms in this set (198) Generalization occurred: Albert responded with fear to other furry animals and fuzzy objects. What happened after Watson classically conditioned “Little Albert” to fear a tame white rat? …
The conditioned fear response was quickly and easily extinguished.
Did Little Albert have parents?
– Albert’s
mother was a wet nurse
. Arvilla gave birth on 9 March 1919 and was listed as a foster mother on the 1920 Hopkins census. … Thus, Arvilla is one of very few women who could have been Albert’s mother. – Douglas was born on the Hopkins campus and cared for by his mother after she left the hospital.
What year was Little Albert experiment?
“Little Albert,” the baby behind John Watson’s famous
1920
emotional conditioning experiment at Johns Hopkins University, has been identified as Douglas Merritte, the son of a wetnurse named Arvilla Merritte who lived and worked at a campus hospital at the time of the experiment — receiving $1 for her baby’s …
Is Little Albert experiment reliable?
Watson & Rayner found that Albert generalised his fear to other white, fluffy things like a rabbit and Watson’s Santa mask. He had the same reactions a month later, although they were a bit less intense. Watson & Rayner’s
experiment was very reliable.
