What is the difference between a process view of distributive justice and an end-state view? a. Process view is a
system of economic distribution is just if the process
by which it comes about is just with no redistribution, and end-state view is with regard to economic distribution does not depend solely on process.
What is end state view?
An “end state” view of economic justice is
one that is concerned about how things turn out in terms of distribution of wealth in a society
. … Rawls argues that the right to the most extensive equal basis liberties may be reduced if doing so benefits the worst-off in society.
What is a process view of distributive justice?
Procedural justice (Process distributive justice) Any economic distribution
(or any system that allows for a particular economic distribution) is just if the process by which it comes about is itself just
. End-state justice (End-state distributive justice)
What is the meaning of distributive justice?
:
the justice that is concerned with the apportionment of privileges, duties, and goods in consonance with the merits of the individual and in the best interest of society
.
What are the four views of distributive justice?
Four theories of justice are discussed:
Rawlsian egalitarianism, or justice as fairness; Dworkinian egalitarianism, or equality of resources
; Steiner-Vallentyne libertarianism, or common ownership; and Nozickian libertarianism, or entitlements.
What are Rawls 2 principles of justice?
Rawls contends that the most rational choice for the parties in the original position are two principles of justice:
The first guarantees the equal basic rights and liberties needed to secure the fundamental interests of free and equal citizens and to pursue a wide range of conceptions of the good
.
What is the focus of distributive justice?
Distributive justice is concerned with
the fair distribution of the burdens and benefits of social cooperation among diverse persons with competing needs and claims
.
Was Nozick an anarchist?
Against anarchism, Nozick claims that
a minimal state is justified
because it (or something very much like it) would arise spontaneously among people living in a hypothetical “state of nature” through transactions that would not involve the violation of anyone’s natural rights.
What is the end state principle?
End-state principles
require constant intervention to keep them in force
. Even if some favored pattern is achieved at time ti, by t2 the free choices of individuals will have upset the pattern. People will have given up their holdings for any number of reasons.
Is Nozick a utilitarian?
Utilitarianism. Nozick created the thought experiment of the “utility monster” to show that average utilitarianism could lead to a situation where the needs of the vast majority were sacrificed for one individual.
What are the 4 types of justice?
This article points out that there are four different types of justice:
distributive (determining who gets what), procedural (determining how fairly people are treated), retributive (based on punishment for wrong-doing) and restorative
(which tries to restore relationships to “rightness.”) All four of these are …
What are examples of distributive justice?
Distributive justice certainly is achieved when equals receive the same allocation of benefits. For example,
public programs that provide social security or medical care to all elderly and retired persons
are examples of distributive justice in a constitutional democracy.
What are the 3 principles of justice?
The three principles that our justice system seeks to reflect are:
equality, fairness and access
. Equality is defined in the dictionary as ‘the state of being equal, especially in status, rights, or opportunities.
What is the importance of distributive justice?
Distributive justice is an essential principle of environmental justice because there is evidence that shows that these
burdens cause health problems
, negatively affect quality of life, and drive down property value.
What is distributive justice according to Aristotle?
Distributive justice implies
that the state should divide or distribute goods and wealth among citizens according to the merit
. ADVERTISEMENTS: Again remedial justice is divided into two, dealing with voluntary transactions (civil law) and the dealing with involuntary transaction (criminal law).
Who first gave the concept of distributive justice?
The most widely discussed theory of distributive justice in the past four decades has been that proposed by
John Rawls
in A Theory of Justice, (Rawls 1971), and Political Liberalism, (Rawls 1993).
