Skip to content

What Is The Doctrine Of Judicial Precedent?

Precedent refers to a court decision that is considered as authority for deciding subsequent cases involving identical or similar facts, or similar legal issues. Precedent is incorporated into the doctrine of stare decisis and requires courts to apply the law in the same manner to cases with the same facts.

What is the doctrine of precedent?

The doctrine of precedent is based on the principle of stare decisis, which requires lower courts to take account of and follow the decisions made by the higher courts where the material facts are the same, and states that as a general rule, courts follow earlier decisions of themselves or of other courts of the same …

What is meant by the doctrine of judicial precedent and give an example?

The doctrine of Judicial Precedent is founded on the principle of ‘stare decisis’, meaning to stand by the decision. Essentially it refers to the idea that once a court makes a decision, both they and other courts beneath them are bound by that decision, except for in certain, limited circumstances.

What is the doctrine of judicial precedence?

2.1 Judicial Precedent or Stare Decisis

The doctrine is a general principle of Common Law that is established in a case to help Courts decide upon similar issues in subsequent cases6. Thus, Judicial Precedent is also known as case law.

What is the doctrine of precedent and why is it important?

Precedent promotes judicial restraint and limits a judge’s ability to determine the outcome of a case in a way that he or she might choose if there were no precedent. This function of precedent gives it its moral force.

What are the two types of precedent?

There are typically said to be two types of precedents. These are binding precedents and persuasive precedents.

Why is precedent important in law?

The Importance of Precedent. In a common law system, judges are obliged to make their rulings as consistent as reasonably possible with previous judicial decisions on the same subject. … These decisions are not binding on the legislature, which can pass laws to overrule unpopular court decisions.

What are the types of judicial precedent?

Three models of judicial precedent have been identified and they comprise the natural model, the rule model and the result model. It is noted that International Court of Justice is not bound to follow judicial precedence in its decisions.

What are the disadvantages of judicial precedent?

Although judicial precedent can ensure that legal matters are predictable and without bias, this system is not without its shortcomings. Judicial precedent offers several disadvantages such as: rigidity, complexity, confusion and injustice.

What is a precedent in law example?

The definition of precedent is a decision that is the basis or reason for future decisions. An example of precedent is the legal decision in Brown v. Board of Education guiding future laws about desegregation . … (law) A decided case which is cited or used as an example to justify a judgment in a subsequent case.

What is another name for judicial precedent?

Judicial precedents (usually known as jurisprudence) are established through repeating the use of one ratio decidendi to solve more than one case. Such cases have to be similar in order to be solved using the same ratio.

What are the advantages of judicial precedent?

The main advantage of using precedent is that it provides certainty in the law. As cases with sufficiently similar material facts are bound by past decisions, it provides an idea of how the case will be decided. Another advantage is that it provides consistent decisions within the law, which also ensures fairness.

Is the Court of Appeal bound by itself?

The Court of Appeal is always bound by previous decisions of the House of Lords. The Court of Appeal generally is also bound by its own previous decisions. … This is the judge who is head of the Court of Appeal Civil Division.

What happens if a judge does not follow precedent?

If a judge acts against precedent and the case is not appealed, the decision will stand. A lower court may not rule against a binding precedent, even if the lower court feels that the precedent is unjust; the lower court may only express the hope that a higher court or the legislature will reform the rule in question.

What are the key principles of the doctrine of precedent?

The general idea behind the doctrine of precedent is that judges, when they are deciding cases, must pay proper respect to past judicial decisions.

How was the concept of precedent developed?

The doctrine of precedent was developed to promote consistency in decision-making by judges, on the basis that like cases should be determined in a like manner. There are two kinds of precedent: binding and persuasive.