In Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (1988),
the Supreme Court held that schools may restrict what is published in student newspapers if the papers have not been established as public forums
.
Why was the Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier important?
Kuhlmeier et al., 484 U.S. 260 (1988), was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that
held that public school curricular student newspapers that have not been established as forums for student expression are subject to a lower level of First Amendment protection than independent student
…
How does Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier affect society?
Answer and Explanation: The U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier
impacted students and school administration following the decision in 1988
. … This ruling has clarified student’s freedom of speech in schools, but as a result of the ruling, student’s free speech in school was further limited.
What was the decision in the Hazelwood and Kuhlmeier case?
Decision and Reasoning
In a 5-3 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court
held that the principal’s actions did not violate the students’ free speech rights
.
What was the argument for kuhlmeier?
Dismayed by the school’s decision, three of the student journalists, including editor Cathy Kuhlmeier, pursued their case in the courts, arguing
that the school had violated their First Amendment right of free speech
.
What happened in the Mapp v Ohio case?
Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961), was a landmark decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in which the Court ruled that
the exclusionary rule, which prevents prosecutors from using evidence in court that was obtained by violating the Fourth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
, applies not only to the federal government but also to …
Who won in Texas v Johnson?
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision in
favor of Johnson
. The high court agreed that symbolic speech – no matter how offensive to some – is protected under the First Amendment.
Can a principal censor a school newspaper?
Kuhlmeier, the high court ruled that school officials can censor school-sponsored publications
if their decision is “reasonably related to a legitimate pedagogical purpose
.” This means school officials must show that they have a reasonable educational reason for censoring the material.
Who wrote the majority opinion in Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier?
majority opinion by
Byron R. White
. No. In a 5-to-3 decision, the Court held that the First Amendment did not require schools to affirmatively promote particular types of student speech.
What states have passed laws to help override the Hazelwood decision?
Second, so far, six states (
Arkansas, California, Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Massachusetts
) have passed student free expression laws and a number of local school districts have enacted student publication policies that limit the ability of school officials to their censor student media.
What happened in Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier quizlet?
What was the ruling of the supreme court? The U.S. Supreme Court
held that the principal’s actions did not violate the students’ free speech rights
. … The student challenged the principal’s ability to remove articles from their newspaper. They stated that it was a violation of their free speech.
Who won NJ VS TLO?
The Supreme Court justices all agreed on some parts of the decision, but three (Justices Brennan, Marshall, and Stevens) dissented in part. The Court unanimously held that students have a Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable search and seizure while in school.
How did the Hazelwood case impact student rights?
In Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (1988),
the Supreme Court held that schools may restrict what is published in student newspapers if the papers have not been established as public forums
.
Who won Morse v Frederick?
In a 5-4 decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the First Amendment does not prevent school administrators from restricting student expression that reasonably is viewed as promoting the use of illegal drugs.
What did Principal Reynolds do to fix the problem?
What did Principal Reynolds do to fix the problem? Did he have any other choices?
Principal Reynolds told the newspaper sponsor to remove the pages that had the articles about pregnancy and divorce
. 4.
What were the arguments for the plaintiff in Mapp v Ohio?
Arguments. For Mapp:
The police, who possessed no warrant to search Mapp’s property, had acted improperly by doing so. Any incriminating evidence found during the search should, therefore
, be thrown out of court and her conviction overturned.
What was Mapp v Ohio and what is the exclusionary rule?
In Mapp v. Ohio, the Supreme
Court ruled that illegally obtained evidence is not admissible in State courts
. … Ohio is known as the “exclusionary rule.” This rule holds that if police violate your constitutional rights in order to obtain evidence, they cannot use that evidence against you.
Why is burning the flag disrespectful?
It may be a
protest against nationalism
or a deliberate and symbolic insult to the people of the country represented by the flag. It may also be a protest at the very laws prohibiting the act of desecrating a flag. Burning or defacing a flag is a crime in some countries.
Did Mapp v Ohio established the exclusionary rule?
In 1914,
the Supreme Court
established the ‘exclusionary rule’ when it held in Weeks v. United States that the federal government could not rely on illegally seized evidence to obtain criminal convictions in federal court. That changed with the Supreme Court’s landmark 1961 decision in Mapp v. …
Is burning the flag illegal?
The U.S. Supreme
Court has held that the government cannot prohibit citizens from desecrating the American flag
. Congress has repeatedly attempted to outlaw flag burning through legislation and constitutional amendments, but none of these attempts have succeeded.
Which issue was at the heart of New York Times v United States?
Often referred to as the “Pentagon Papers” case, the landmark Supreme Court decision in New York Times Co. v. United States, 403 U.S. 713 (1971), defended
the First Amendment right of free press against prior restraint by the government
.
What is meant by yellow journalism?
Yellow journalism was
a style of newspaper reporting that emphasized sensationalism over facts
. … The term originated in the competition over the New York City newspaper market between major newspaper publishers Joseph Pulitzer and William Randolph Hearst.
Do students have freedom of speech in school?
The U.S. Supreme Court has said that students “
do not shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech and expression
at the schoolhouse gate.” … Though public school students do possess First Amendment freedoms, the courts allow school officials to regulate certain types of student expression.
What can you get dress coded for?
Today, most states have laws that allow
school boards
to make dress code rules for students within their district to promote a safe, disciplined school environment, prevent interference with schoolwork and discipline, and to encourage uniformity of student dress.
Who won the Bethel vs Fraser case?
Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser, legal case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on July 7, 1986, ruled (7–2) that school officials did not violate a student’s free speech and due process rights when he was disciplined for making a lewd and vulgar speech at a school assembly.
What does legitimate pedagogical concerns mean?
legitimate penological interests
.”
The “legitimate pedagogical concerns” the Hazelwood decision listed as grounds for censorship include: • Material that is “ungrammatical, poorly written, inadequately researched, biased or prejudiced, vulgar or profane or unsuitable for immature audiences.” •
Is burning a flag protected speech?
RULING Yes. REASONING (5-4) The majority of the Court, according to Justice William Brennan, agreed with Johnson and held that flag burning constitutes a form of “symbolic speech” that
is protected by the First Amendment
.
What is prior restraint?
In First Amendment law, prior restraint is
government action that prohibits speech or other expression before the speech happens
. .
What conclusion did the Supreme Court come to in Tinker v Des Moines?
In a 7-2 decision, the Supreme Court’s
majority ruled that neither students nor teachers “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate
.” The Court took the position that school officials could not prohibit only on the suspicion that the speech might disrupt the learning …
When was Cathy Kuhlmeier born?
Cathy A Kuhlmeier, born
1958
.
What amendment is Brown vs Board of Education?
Chief Justice Earl Warren delivered the unanimous ruling in the landmark civil rights case. State-sanctioned segregation of public schools was a violation of
the 14th Amendment
and was therefore unconstitutional.
What articles were removed from the spectrum by the principal?
873 (1954). We also conclude that Principal Reynolds acted reasonably in requiring the deletion from the May 13 issue of Spectrum of the pregnancy article,
the divorce article
, and the remaining articles that were to appear on the same pages of the newspaper.
What was the main result of Morse v Frederick quizlet?
What was the ruling in this case? The Supreme Court ruled that
Frederick’s First Amendment rights were not violated
and that “schools may take steps to safeguard those entrusted to their care from speech that can reasonably be regarded as encouraging illegal drug use.”
Why did the newspaper advisor give the paper to Principal Reynolds for review?
The newspaper advisor gave the paper to Principal Reynolds to review prior to
publication because it was standard procedure
. … Principal Reynolds could have had students revise the stories prior to publication, but that would most likely have delayed the paper’s publication until after the end of the school year.
What concerns did Principal Reynolds have regarding the two articles What options did the principal have other than deleting entire pages from the student paper?
Do you think the principal had any options other than deleting entire pages from the student paper?
He was concerned for the privacy of the students interviewed and their families
. The more respectable action would’ve been to confront the students about the article and compromised changes.
Why is New Jersey v. T.L.O. important?
In New Jersey v. T.L.O., the
U.S. Supreme Court set forth the principles governing searches by public school authorities
.
What was the impact of the New Jersey vs TLO case?
The Supreme Court ultimately held
that probable cause was not required in school searches
, finding that students were subject to a lower level of Fourth Amendment protection. The decision generated a great deal of backlash when it was decided in 1985.
What is the significance of the New Jersey v. T.L.O. case?
On January 15, 1985, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in New Jersey v. T.L.O.,
holding that public school administrators can search a student’s belongings if they have a reasonable suspicion of criminal activity
.
What happened in the Hazelwood case?
Background. Students in the Journalism II class at Hazelwood East High School in St. Louis, Missouri wrote stories about
their peers’ experiences with teen pregnancy and the impact of divorce
. … The trial court ruled that the school had the authority to remove articles that were written as part of a class.
How did the Hazelwood case impact student rights?
In Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (1988),
the Supreme Court held that schools may restrict what is published in student newspapers if the papers have not been established as public forums
.
Can a principal censor a school newspaper?
Kuhlmeier, the high court ruled that school officials can censor school-sponsored publications
if their decision is “reasonably related to a legitimate pedagogical purpose
.” This means school officials must show that they have a reasonable educational reason for censoring the material.
