Explanation: The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was signed into effect by President Jackson
What was the Indian Removal Act and what were its effects?
The Removal Act
paved the way for the forced expulsion of tens of thousands of American Indians from their land into the West
in an event widely known as the “Trail of Tears,” a forced resettlement of the Indian population.
What was the result of the Indian Removal Act of 1830?
In 1830, he signed the Indian Removal Act, which gave
the federal government the power to exchange Native-held land in the cotton kingdom east of the Mississippi for land to the west
, in the “Indian colonization zone” that the United States had acquired as part of the Louisiana Purchase.
Why is the Indian Removal Act important?
It
gave the president power to negotiate removal treaties with Indian tribes living east of the Mississippi
. Under these treaties, the Indians were to give up their lands east of the Mississippi in exchange for lands to the west. Those wishing to remain in the east would become citizens of their home state.
Who benefited from the Indian Removal Act?
Most white Americans
supported the Removal Act, especially southerners who were eager to expand southward. Expansion south would be good for the country and the future of the country's economy with the later introduction of cotton production in the south.
How did the Indian Removal Act violate the Constitution?
Jackson warned the tribes that if they failed to move, they would lose their independence and fall under state laws. Jackson backed an Indian removal bill in Congress. Members of Congress like Davy Crockett argued that Jackson violated the
Constitution by refusing to enforce treaties that guaranteed Indian land rights.
What impact did the Indian Removal Act have on American society?
But the forced relocation proved popular with voters.
It freed more than 25 million acres of fertile, lucrative farmland to mostly white settlement in Georgia, Florida, North Carolina, Tennessee, Alabama, Mississippi, and Arkansas
.
What were the arguments against the Indian Removal Act?
The colonists did not consider that the land was their ancestral land and parts of it held significant cultural, social, and even religious symbolism for the natives. The natives were also
being forced to build new settlements afresh
, and the progress that they had made over the years was being undone.
How did the Supreme Court interpret the Indian Removal Act?
How did the Supreme Court interpret the Indian Removal Act?
Tribes could choose to remain on their lands. Tribes had no right to any land in the new territories
. Tribes had to abide by the decisions of the United States.
What did the Indian Removal Act require?
What did the Indian Removal Act require? … It
required that all Americans Indians east Mississippi River would move to lands farther west
. Black Hawk's War was the result.
What were the consequences of the Indian Removal Act quizlet?
What were the consequences of the Indian Removal Act?
This force the Cherokees to go on a long hard journey from their homeland to Indian territory one fourths of their population died
and this was known as the trail of tears. Not all of the Cherokees moved west.
Who opposed the Indian Removal Act of 1830?
President Andrew Jackson signed the measure into law on May 28, 1830. 3. The legendary frontiersman and
Tennessee congressman Davy Crockett
opposed the Indian Removal Act, declaring that his decision would “not make me ashamed in the Day of Judgment.”
What was the intention of the Indian Removal Act of 1830 quizlet?
The Indian Removal Act was a federal law that President Andrew Jackson promoted. Congress passed the law in 1830. Because Congress wanted
to make more land in the Southeast available to white settlers
, the law required Native Americans living east of the Mississippi River to move west of it.
What decision of the Supreme Court decisions did President Jackson ignore?
President Andrew Jackson ignored the Court's decision in
Worcester v. Georgia
, but later issued a proclamation of the Supreme Court's ultimate power to decide constitutional questions and emphasizing that its decisions had to be obeyed.
Who was removed by the Trail of Tears?
Trail of Tears, in U.S. history, the forced relocation during the 1830s of
Eastern Woodlands Indians
of the Southeast region of the United States (including Cherokee, Creek, Chickasaw, Choctaw, and Seminole, among other nations) to Indian Territory west of the Mississippi River.
Which did not occur as a result of the Indian Removal Act?
NOT :The Supreme Court held that Georgia could not take away Cherokee lands. Which did not occur as a result of the Indian Removal Act?
New treaties were created with the federal government
. … The Cherokee struggled to support themselves in Indian Territory.
