Carr (1962) Issue: Charles Baker brought to light apportionment laws being ignored by the state of Tennessee . A lack of political question, previous court intervention in apportionment affairs and equal protection under the 14th amendment gave the court enough reason to rule on legislative apportionment. ...
What was the issue in Baker v Carr quizlet?
Baker argued that the existing apportionment denied voters of urban areas equal protection under the law as guaranteed by the 14th Amendment . The federal court refused to hear the case under the “political question” doctrine, and the case was appealed to the Supreme Court.
What did the Baker v Carr case establish?
Baker v. Carr, (1962), U.S. Supreme Court case that forced the Tennessee legislature to reapportion itself on the basis of population . Thus the legislature of Tennessee had violated the constitutionally guaranteed right of equal protection (q.v.). ...
What is the significance of the Supreme Court case Baker v Carr quizlet?
What is the significance of Baker v Carr.? The Court held that that redistricting qualifies as a justiciable question , thus enabling federal courts to hear redistricting cases.
What was the argument in Baker v Carr?
Case Summary
Baker argued that because of population changes in the state, specifically migration to cities , his vote in an urban area had much less weight than that of a voter in a rural district, thus constituting a “debasement of [his] votes.”
What was the majority opinion in Baker v Carr?
Justice Brennan wrote the majority opinion of the court, essentially stating that dilution of votes was, in fact, denying the residents of Tennessee equal protection of the Fourteenth Amendment . Justice Douglas wrote a concurring opinion, stating that voters should have a full constitutional value of their vote.
What impact did the decision in Baker v Carr 1962 have on congressional redistricting quizlet?
What was the precedent set in Baker v. Carr (1961)? The ruling was significant in the area of redistricting and racial gerrymandering. The court ruled in a 5-4 decision that redistricting based on race must be held to a standard of strict scrutiny under the equal protection clause .
Who did baker Sue in Baker v Carr?
A group of urban voters including Memphis resident Charles Baker sued Tennessee Secretary of State Joseph Carr for more equal representation. In a 6-2 decision, Justice William Brennan wrote for the majority that the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause was valid grounds to bring a reapportionment lawsuit.
What was the outcome of wesberry v Sanders?
Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 (1964), was a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court ruled that districts in the United States House of Representatives must be approximately equal in population.
Which of the following is a consequence of the ruling established in Baker v Carr?
Which of the following is a consequence of the ruling established in Baker v. Carr? When redistricting, states must create relatively similarly sized districts to ensure voter equality.
What were the significant facts of Baker v Carr 1961 quizlet?
Charles W. Baker and other Tennessee citizens alleged that a 1901 law designed to apportion the seats for the state’s General Assembly was virtually ignored . Baker’s suit detailed how Tennessee’s reapportionment efforts ignored significant economic growth and population shifts within the state.
Why did the US Supreme Court rule against the state of Tennessee in Baker v Carr quizlet?
Why did the US Supreme Court rule against the state of Tennessee in Baker v. Carr? Tennessee had discriminated in favor of city voters over rural voters . Tennessee had not redistricted since 1901, keeping rural districts in power.
What important principle did the Supreme Court established in the cases of Baker v Carr and Reynolds v Sims?
Sims (1964), using the Supreme Court’s precedent set in Baker v. Carr (1962), Warren held that representation in state legislatures must be apportioned equally on the basis of population rather than geographical areas, remarking that “legislators represent people, not acres or trees. ” In...
What was the outcome of Baker v Carr 1962 quizlet?
Terms in this set (2)
Decision: The Warren Court reached a 6-2 verdict in favor of Baker . A lack of political question, previous court intervention in apportionment affairs and equal protection under the 14th amendment gave the court enough reason to rule on legislative apportionment.
What amendment did Baker v Carr violate?
The case was brought by a group of Tennessee voters who alleged that the apportionment of Tennessee’s state legislature failed to account for significant population variations between districts, violating the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to United States Constitution .
Who wrote the majority opinion in Baker v Carr?
majority opinion by William J. Brennan, Jr. In an opinion which explored the nature of “political questions” and the appropriateness of Court action in them, the Court held that there were no such questions to be answered in this case and that legislative apportionment was a justiciable issue.
