Bakke , the Supreme Court ruled that
a university’s use of racial quotas in its admissions process was unlawful
, but a school’s use of “affirmative action” to accept more outvoted candidates was constitutional in some circumstances.
What did the Supreme Court’s decision in Regents of the University of California v Bakke do quizlet?
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, (1978) was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States. It
upheld affirmative action, allowing race to be one of several factors in college admission policy
.
What is the significance of the Bakke case?
Bakke (1978), the Supreme Court ruled that
a university’s use of racial “quotas” in its admissions process was unconstitutional
, but a school’s use of “affirmative action” to accept more minority applicants was constitutional in some circumstances.
How did the decision in Regents of the University of California v Bakke affect individual rights?
Board of Education, and Regents of California v. … How did the decision in Regents v. Bakke affect individual rights?
It limited rights by giving all minorities higher priority.
What was the outcome of the court case Obergefell V Hodges quizlet?
Obergefell v Hodges is the Supreme Court case where it was ruled that
the fundamental right to marry is guaranteed to same sex couples by both the Due Process Clause and the Equal Protection Clause
.
What was the significance of the Plessy v Ferguson case quizlet?
Plessy v. Ferguson was a landmark 1896 U.S. Supreme Court decision that
upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the “separate but equal” doctrine
. The case stemmed from an 1892 incident in which African-American train passenger Homer Plessy refused to sit in a car for blacks.
What was the significance of Allan Bakke’s Supreme Court case quizlet?
The court ruled in favor of Allan Bakke saying
that racial quotas violated equal protection under the law in the 14th amendment
. The court ordered that Bakke be admitted to The University of California.
What was the main outcome of the Supreme Court case of Griggs v Duke Power quizlet?
1971: Griggs v. Duke Power Co. the Supreme Court ruled that
Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act prohibits not only intentional job discrimination, but also employer practices that have a discriminatory effect on minorities and women
.
What is the likely effect of the court’s ruling in the Bakke case?
According to the quote, what is the likely effect of the Court’s ruling in the Bakke case?
Colleges can consider race but cannot use strict racial quotas in admission practices
.
Who won the Bakke case?
Bakke decision, formally Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, ruling in which, on June 28, 1978, the U.S. Supreme Court declared affirmative action constitutional but invalidated the use of racial quotas.
He felt he was denied admission to school based on race. What was the social impact of the decision in Brown v. Board of Education?
It overturned the idea of the “separate but equal” concept
.
The social impact of the decision in Brown vs. Board of Education
strengthened the growing civil rights movement and thus established the idea of the “separate but equal.”
What was the significance of Obergefell V Hodges?
On June 26, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that
all same-sex couples are guaranteed the right to marry
, which extended legal marriage recognition to same-sex couples throughout the United States.
What were the two main issues in the Obergefell V Hodges case quizlet?
The plaintiffs in each case argued that
the states’ statutes violated the Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
, and one group of plaintiffs also brought claims under the Civil Rights Act.
What level of scrutiny was used in Obergefell V Hodges?
The Supreme Court has held that governmental action infringing upon fundamental rights is subject to
strict scrutiny
,
26
and thus must be narrowly tailored to a compelling government interest.
What was the result of the Plessy case quizlet?
A case in which the Supreme Court ruled that segregated, “equal but separate”
public accommodations for blacks and whites did not violate the 14th amendment
. This ruling made segregation legal.
