Intrusions of land-hungry settlers, treaties with the U.S., and the Indian Removal Act (1830) resulted in
the forced removal and migration of many eastern Indian nations to lands west of the Mississippi.
What were the effects of the Indian Removal Act of 1830?
Explanation: The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was signed into effect by President Jackson, which
allowed Native Americans to settle in land within state borders in exchange for unsettled land west of the Mississippi
. Many Native American tribes reacted peacefully, but many reacted violently.
What was the effect of the Indian Removal Act of 1830 Why is the Trail of Tears important?
The Removal Act
paved the way for the forced expulsion of tens of thousands of American Indians from their land into the West
in an event widely known as the “Trail of Tears,” a forced resettlement of the Indian population.
What was the effect of the Indian Removal Act of 1830 quizlet?
The Indian Removal Act was signed into law in 1830.
The law granted unsettled lands west of the Mississippi to Native Americans in exchange for their land with pre-existing borders
. The treaty traded Cherokee land east of the Mississippi River for $5 million.
What were some economic effects of the Indian Removal Act?
The Indian Removal Act
created more land available for white planters to settle and cultivate
, thus helping to create an economic boom for the South, whose economy was driven by “king cotton.” It also furthered the South's reliance on slavery, and increased the amount of slave sales, another aspect of the Southern …
What were the immediate and long term effects of the Indian Removal Act?
2 Immediate Gains and Losses
The terms
“Trail of Tears” and “The Place Where They Cried”
refer to the suffering of Native Americans affected by the Indian Removal Act. It is estimated that the five tribes lost 1 in 4 of their population to cholera, starvation, cold and exhaustion during the move west.
Why is the Indian Removal Act important?
It
gave the president power to negotiate removal treaties with Indian tribes living east of the Mississippi
. Under these treaties, the Indians were to give up their lands east of the Mississippi in exchange for lands to the west. Those wishing to remain in the east would become citizens of their home state.
Who benefited from the Indian Removal Act?
Most white Americans
supported the Removal Act, especially southerners who were eager to expand southward. Expansion south would be good for the country and the future of the country's economy with the later introduction of cotton production in the south.
Which of these best describes the outcome of the Indian Removal Act?
The act
removed territory from the Cherokee and auctioned it off to prospectors
. The act created a constitution for the five tribes that had been removed to Indian Territory.
What was not a result of the Indian Removal Act?
Several tribes resisted removal,
causing conflicts to erupt
. Some tribes were forcibly removed, causing distrust for the government. … The Cherokee were forced west along the Trail of Tears years later.
How did President Jackson justify the Indian Removal Act?
Jackson declared that removal would
“incalculably strengthen the southwestern frontier
.” Clearing Alabama and Mississippi of their Indian populations, he said, would “enable those states to advance rapidly in population, wealth, and power.”
How did the Indian Removal Act violate the Constitution?
In 1828, Jackson was elected president. … Jackson backed an Indian removal bill in Congress. Members of Congress like Davy Crockett argued that Jackson violated the Constitution
by refusing to enforce treaties that guaranteed Indian land rights.
What best describes the Indian Removal Act of 1830?
On May 28, 1830, the Indian Removal Act was signed by President Jackson.
The Act allowed the government to divide land west of the Mississippi to give to Indian tribes in exchange for the land they'd lost
. The government would pick up the cost of relocating the Indians and helping them resettle.
How did the Supreme Court interpret the Indian Removal Act?
How did the Supreme Court interpret the Indian Removal Act?
Tribes could choose to remain on their lands. Tribes had no right to any land in the new territories
. Tribes had to abide by the decisions of the United States.
Which did not occur as a result of the Indian Removal Act quizlet?
Which did not occur as a result of the Indian Removal Act?
New treaties were created with the federal government.
… The Cherokee struggled to support themselves in Indian Territory.
What was one result of American Indian Removal?
During their exodus to Indian Territory, Cherokees
lost about a quarter of their population to disease, starvation and hardship
.
