In a unanimous decision, the Court held that
the Equal Protection Clause required that Sweatt be admitted to the university
. The Court found that the “law school for Negroes,” which was to have opened in 1947, would have been grossly unequal to the University of Texas Law School.
What was Thurgood Marshall’s sociological argument in Sweatt v painter?
The Court argued
that the separate school would be inferior in a number of areas
, including faculty, course variety, library facilities, legal writing opportunities, and overall prestige.
Who was painter in the case of Sweatt v painter quizlet?
Who was Painter?
Theophilis Shickel Painter
was the President of The University of Texas at Austin. He refused admission to the law school for Sweatt.
What did the Supreme Court decide in Sweatt v painter quizlet?
What did the Supreme Court decide in SWEATT V. PAINTER? … The Supreme Court
declared that separate educations for blacks and whites were not equal
,therefore overturning the Plessy (1896) case.
What did the Supreme Court case of Sweatt v painter say in 1950?
The Supreme Court ruled that in states where public graduate and professional schools existed for white students but not for black students, black students must be admitted to the all-white institutions, and
that the equal protection clause required Sweatt’s admission to the University of Texas School of Law
.
What statement best describes the court’s decision in Sweatt v painter?
What statement best describes the Court’s decision in Sweatt v. Painter?
The Court ruled Sweatt should be admitted to the Texas Law School because the law school for black students was not equal to the law school for white students.
What was the significance of the Plessy v Ferguson case quizlet?
Plessy v. Ferguson was a landmark 1896 U.S. Supreme Court decision that
upheld the constitutionality of racial segregation under the “separate but equal” doctrine
. The case stemmed from an 1892 incident in which African-American train passenger Homer Plessy refused to sit in a car for blacks.
What was the Brown vs Board of Education quizlet?
The ruling of the case “Brown vs the Board of Education” is, that
racial segregation is unconstitutional in public schools
. … The Supreme Court’s decision was that segregation is unconstitutional.
What was the result of the Brown case quizlet?
What was the result of Brown v Board of Education?
The ruling meant that it was illegal to segregate schools and schools had to integrate
. Supreme Court did not give a deadline by which schools had to integrate, which meant many states chose not to desegregate their schools until 1960’s.
What was the difference between the Supreme Court decisions in Sweatt v painter?
What was the difference between the Supreme Court decisions in Sweatt v. Painter and Brown v. … Sweatt
struck down “separate but equal” graduate and professional schools. Brown struck down “separate but equal” public schools
.
Which best describes the circumstances that led to Brown v Board of Education?
Which best describes the circumstances that led to Brown v. Board of Education?
A state university permitted an African American student to attend but not interact with white students
. Orval Faubus sent the Arkansas National Guard to block African American students from attending white schools.
What happened in Miranda v Arizona quizlet?
The Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision written by Chief Justice Earl Warren, ruled that
the prosecution could not introduce Miranda’s confession as evidence in a criminal trial
because the police had failed to first inform Miranda of his right to an attorney and against self-incrimination.
What did the 1950 Court case mclaurin v Oklahoma State Regents do that helped blacks?
Oklahoma State Regents, 339 U.S. 637 (1950), was a United States Supreme Court case that
prohibited racial segregation in state supported graduate or professional education
. The unanimous decision was delivered on the same day as another case involving similar issues, Sweatt v. Painter.
Why does the Supreme Court feel that the separate but equal doctrine does not violate the 14th Amendment?
Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal
. Therefore, we hold that the plaintiffs and others similarly situated for whom the actions have been brought are, by reason of the segregation complained of, deprived of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment.
What was White vs regester?
Even without evidence of intentional racial discrimination by the state of Texas, the Supreme Court ruled in White v. Regester that the
huge Bexar County voting district violated the Fourteenth Amendment equal protection rights of Mexican American voters
.
