In Muller vs. Oregon, a laundry owner argued that
limiting women to a ten-hour work day was an unconstitutional violation of their right to choose their own employment
. Due in large part to a unique legal brief by Louis Brandeis, the Supreme Court concluded that the states could limit the working hours of women.
What argument did the Supreme Court give in Muller v Oregon to justify regulating women’s labor?
Supreme Court of the United States
Appellant’s claim:
Oregon’s 1903 maximum hours law is unconstitutional
. Oregon’s limit on the working hours of women was constitutional under the Fourteenth Amendment, as it was justified by the strong state interest in protecting women’s health.
What was important about Muller v Oregon?
Muller v. Oregon (1908) is a U.S. Supreme Court case in which
the Court considered whether a state could limit the amount of hours a woman could work while not also limiting the hours of men
. … On September 4, 1905, he required a female employee to work more than ten hours in a single day.
What was the decision in Muller vs Oregon?
Muller v. Oregon was a Supreme Court case decided on February 24, 1908. It was based on an Oregon law that
was passed in 1903 that set working hours for women
. The Oregon law stated that women could not work more than ten hours a day in jobs associated with factories and laundries.
What was Muller v Oregon quizlet?
A supreme court case decided in 1908 that pertained to the working hours of women. The court ruled in favor of Oregon, that
these restrictions were legal under the state laws to protect women’s health
.
What type of evidence did Louis Brandeis use and what did he argue in the Muller v Oregon case?
Muller v. State of Oregon was an influential Supreme Court decision that asserted the right of the government to limit the workday for women. Using
social science evidence
, Louis Brandeis argued before the Court that women who worked long hours on the job suffered both physical and psychological problems.
Why did the Supreme Court uphold laws limiting women’s hours in the 1908 case Muller v Oregon?
Muller believed
the Oregon law was unconstitutional because it violated his freedom of contract under the 14th Amendment’s Due Process Clause under the rule of Lochner
and was not a valid health regulation. … Justice David Brewer wrote the unanimous opinion for the Court upholding Oregon’s 1903 statute.
Why was Muller v Oregon controversial?
In Muller vs. Oregon, a laundry owner argued that
limiting women to a ten-hour work day
was an unconstitutional violation of their right to choose their own employment. Due in large part to a unique legal brief by Louis Brandeis, the Supreme Court concluded that the states could limit the working hours of women.
What was the impact of the Muller v Oregon case?
Muller v. Oregon, one of the most important U.S. Supreme Court cases of the Progressive Era,
upheld an Oregon law limiting the workday for female wage earners to ten hours
. The case established a precedent in 1908 to expand the reach of state activity into the realm of protective labor legislation.
What did the 1903 Muller v Oregon decision uphold?
This year marks the 100th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in Muller v. Oregon. In that historic case, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a 1903 Oregon statute prohibiting employment of women in industrial jobs for more than ten hours per day.
Why is Muller v Oregon 1908 considered a landmark case quizlet?
This was a landmark Supreme Court decision
because it relates to both sex discrimination and labor laws
.
How does the Court’s decision in Muller differ from its decision in Lochner?
In Lochner , the Court overturned a New York State law meant to regulate the hours that bakers could work, but three years later, in Muller , the justices
upheld an Oregon regulation limiting the hours that women could work
. … If the procedure was fair, then the law would stand, regardless of its content.
What was the significance of the Brandeis brief?
The Brandeis brief was
a pioneering legal brief
that was the first in United States legal history to rely more on a compilation of scientific information and social science than on legal citations.
Why did the Muller v Oregon cause controversy quizlet?
the Court struck down the minimum wage law as unconstitutional, arguing that
it violated the Due Process Clause of the Constitution’s Fifth Amendment
.
Who won the Muller v Oregon case?
Facts of the case
Oregon enacted a law that limited women to ten hours of work in factories and laundries. The owner of a laundry business,
Curt Muller
, was fined $10 when he violated the law. Muller appealed the conviction. The state supreme court upheld the law’s constitutionality.
What happened in Schenck v United States quizlet?
Schenck v. United States, 249 U.S. 47 (1919), was a United States Supreme Court decision that
upheld the Espionage Act of 1917 and concluded that a defendant did not have a First Amendment right to express freedom of speech against the draft during World War I
.
