The Court unanimously upheld the Oregon regulation .
Why did Muller believe the Oregon law was unconstitutional?
Referring to the Fourteenth Amendment, Muller argued the Oregon law was unconstitutional since “the statute [law} does not apply equally to all persons . . . ” Brandeis, using the lengthy brief, countered that women as a group needed special protection.
What overturned Muller v Oregon?
Oregon resulted in other state laws related to wages, work hours, and work conditions. The decision was overturned, however in the 1923 case of Adkins v. Children’s Hospital .
Why is Muller v Oregon important?
State of Oregon. Muller v. State of Oregon, U.S. Supreme Court case decided in 1908 that, although it appeared to promote the health and welfare of female workers , in fact led to additional protective legislation that was detrimental to equality in the workplace for years to come.
What precedent did Muller v Oregon set?
}} Muller v. Oregon, 208 U.S. 412 (1908), was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court. Women were provided by state mandate lesser work-hours than allotted to men . The posed question was whether women’s liberty to negotiate a contract with an employer should be equal to a man’s.
What did the Supreme Court decide in Muller v Oregon quizlet?
A supreme court case decided in 1908 that pertained to the working hours of women . The court ruled in favor of Oregon, that these restrictions were legal under the state laws to protect women’s health.
What type of evidence did Louis Brandeis use and what did he argue in the Muller v Oregon case?
Muller v. State of Oregon was an influential Supreme Court decision that asserted the right of the government to limit the workday for women. Using social science evidence , Louis Brandeis argued before the Court that women who worked long hours on the job suffered both physical and psychological problems.
Who was the judge that persuaded the Court to limit working hours?
| Louis Brandeis | Born Louis David BrandeisNovember 13, 1856 Louisville, Kentucky, U.S. | Died October 5, 1941 (aged 84) Washington, D.C., U.S. | Political party Republican (before 1912) Democratic (after 1912) | Spouse(s) Alice Goldmark ( m. 1891) |
|---|
How does the Court’s decision in Muller differ from its decision in Lochner?
In Lochner , the Court overturned a New York State law meant to regulate the hours that bakers could work, but three years later, in Muller , the justices upheld an Oregon regulation limiting the hours that women could work . ... If the procedure was fair, then the law would stand, regardless of its content.
What was the significance of the Brandeis brief?
The Brandeis brief was a pioneering legal brief that was the first in United States legal history to rely more on a compilation of scientific information and social science than on legal citations.
Why is Muller v Oregon 1908 considered a landmark case quizlet?
This was a landmark Supreme Court decision because it relates to both sex discrimination and labor laws .
What did the law call for in Adkins?
Children’s Hospital, 261 U.S. 525 (1923), is a United States Supreme Court opinion that federal minimum wage legislation for women was an unconstitutional infringement of liberty of contract , as protected by the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment.
Do you agree with the Supreme Court’s decision in Muller give reasons for your answer?
Do you agree with the Supreme Court’s decision in Muller? Give reasons for your answer? Yes, Muller broke the law that was in place . Why was the Espionage Act passed?
How did Muller v Oregon impact future cases?
Muller v. Oregon, one of the most important U.S. Supreme Court cases of the Progressive Era, upheld an Oregon law limiting the workday for female wage earners to ten hours . The case established a precedent in 1908 to expand the reach of state activity into the realm of protective labor legislation.
Why did the Supreme Court uphold laws limiting women’s hours in the 1908 case Muller v Oregon?
The brief argued that long hours were “more disastrous to the health of women than of man” by affecting “childbirth and female functions” and was of public interest because the “overwork of future mothers thus directly attacks the welfare of the nation.” All told, the brief had only two pages of legal argument among ...
Which Supreme Court case established the new legal precedent that declared that a mandated minimum wage between an employer and an employee is constitutional?
Children’s Hospital . Adkins v. Children’s Hospital, (1923), U.S. Supreme Court case in which the court invalidated a board established by Congress to set minimum wages for women workers in the District of Columbia.
