In a 7-2 decision, the Supreme Court’s majority ruled that
neither students nor teachers “shed their constitutional rights to freedom of speech or expression at the schoolhouse gate
.” The Court took the position that school officials could not prohibit only on the suspicion that the speech might disrupt the learning …
Who won in the Tinker vs Des Moines?
Decision: In 1969 the United States Supreme Court ruled in a 7-2 decision in
favor of the students
. The high court agreed that students’ free rights should be protected and said, “Students don’t shed their constitutional rights at the school house gates.”
How does the ruling in Tinker been modified by the Supreme Court?
In a 7 to 2 decision, the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Tinkers and the students. The Court determined that
the wearing of armbands was protected by the First Amendment’s free speech clause
.
What was the importance of the Supreme Court case of Tinker v Des Moines?
Tinker v. Des Moines is a historic Supreme Court ruling from 1969 that
cemented students’ rights to free speech in public schools
. Mary Beth Tinker was a 13-year-old junior high school student in December 1965 when she and a group of students decided to wear black armbands to school to protest the war in Vietnam.
Do you agree or disagree with the Supreme Court ruling in Tinker v Des Moines Independent Community School District briefly explain your position?
Yes
. Justice Abe Fortas delivered the opinion of the 7-2 majority. The Supreme Court held that the armbands represented pure speech that is entirely separate from the actions or conduct of those participating in it.
Why did the Supreme Court find their suspension unconstitutional?
Why did the Supreme Court find their suspension unconstitutional? The Supreme Court found their suspension unconstitutional
because the arm bands were considered “Pure Speech
.” The armbands did not cause interference with school work. … Wearing armbands counted as symbolic speech.
What was tinkers argument?
In Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969), the Supreme Court ruled that
public school officials cannot censor student expression unless they can reasonably forecast that the speech will substantially disrupt school activities or invade the rights of others
.
Do students abandon or lose their rights at the schoolhouse gates?
Simply put, in the three decades since Tinker, the courts have made it clear that
students leave most of their constitutional rights at the schoolhouse gate
.
Why did the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the students who wore armbands?
They ruled in favor of the students. It held that armbands were
form of “speech” because the armbands were symbols representing ideas
. What amendment protected the students rights to wear the arm bands in the Tinker Case?
Why was Justice Black so concerned about the court’s decision in the Tinker case?
Justice Hugo Black dissented. He pointed out that the
case involved a small number of students who refused to obey the instructions of school officials
, and argued that allowing this behavior would have a negative effect on schools and on the country as a whole.
What was the importance of the Supreme Court case of Tinker v. Des Moines quizlet?
In 1969 the United States Supreme Court ruled in a 7-2 decision in favor of the students.
The court agreed that students rights should be protected and said
, “Students don’t shed their constitutional rights at the school house gates.”
What was the significance of Hazelwood vs kuhlmeier?
In Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (1988),
the Supreme Court held that schools may restrict what is published in student newspapers if the papers have not been established as public forums
.
What is the relationship between the Supreme Court and the lower courts?
Lower courts are obligated to follow the precedent set by the Supreme Court when rendering decisions
. In almost all instances, the Supreme Court does not hear appeals as a matter of right; instead, parties must petition the Court for a writ of certiorari.
Which best describes how Tinker v. Des Moines expanded protected speech under the First Amendment?
Which best describes how Tinker v. Des Moines expanded protected speech under the First Amendment?
The decision affirmed the protection of unpopular opinions.
… The decision affirmed the protection of all political speech.
What has been the trend of Supreme Court rulings in relation to the Tinker standard since 1969?
what has been the trend of Supreme Court rulings in relation to the Tinker standard since 1969?
They have limited the scope of the Tinker ruling
. when Stephen Wormier says the Tinker case “was almost like a Declaration of Independence for students,” he employs which literary device?
What are the three ways in which a case can reach the Supreme Court quizlet?
- Writ of Certiorari. an order from the Curt to a lower court to send up the records on a case fro review.
- On Appeal. the decision of a lower federal or state court has been requested to be reviewed.
- The Solicitor General. …
- Selecting Cases.
