What Were The Arguments For Ratifying The Constitution?

by | Last updated on January 24, 2024

, , , ,

The Federalists

wanted a strong government and strong executive branch

, while the anti-Federalists wanted a weaker central government. The Federalists did not want a bill of rights —they thought the new was sufficient. The anti-federalists demanded a bill of rights.

What were the arguments against ratifying the Constitution?

The Anti-Federalists opposed the ratification of the 1787 U.S. Constitution because they

feared that the new national government would be too powerful and thus threaten individual liberties

, given the absence of a bill of rights.

What were the main arguments for and against ratification of the Constitution quizlet?

They

believed that a bill of rights was essential to protect the people from the federal government

. The Anti-Federalists did not want a powerful national government taking away those rights. The lack of a bill of rights became the focus of the Anti-Federalist campaign against ratification.

How was the Constitution debated and ratified?

The debate over ratification was

waged in the newspapers, through pamphlets, and on the floor of the state conventions

, where the vote was often close. Those who favored the strong national government provided for in the Constitution called themselves the Federalists; their opponents became the Antifederalists.

What were the Federalists main arguments?

The Federalists wanted

a strong government and strong executive branch

, while the anti-Federalists wanted a weaker central government. The Federalists did not want a bill of rights —they thought the new constitution was sufficient.

How did the Federalists support the Constitution?

To ensure adoption of the Constitution, the Federalists, such as James Madison,

promised to add amendments specifically protecting individual liberties

. These amendments, including the First Amendment, became the Bill of Rights. James Madison later became a Democratic-Republican and opposed many Federalist policies.

Which principle was built in to the Constitution?

The Principles Underlying the Constitution

Federalism aside, three key principles are the crux of the Constitution:

separation of powers, checks and balances, and bicameralism

.

What was the main anti federalist argument against ratifying the Constitution quizlet?

What arguments did the anti-federalists make against ratifying the Constitution? A argument there were three basic issues, whether the Constitution would maintain the republican government, the national government would have too much power, and

the bill of rights was needed in the Constitution

.

What impact did the anti federalists have on the United States Constitution quizlet?

The Anti-Federalists

believed the people's liberties needed protection from the government

. Their pressure and threats to block ratification of the Constitution led the Federalists to agree to add a “Bill of Rights” to the Constitution if it were to be ratified.

How did the Federalist Papers generate support for ratifying the Constitution?

The 85 essays succeeded by

helping to persuade doubtful New Yorkers to ratify the Constitution

. Today, The Federalist Papers helps us to more clearly understand what the writers of the Constitution had in mind when they drafted that amazing document 200 years ago.

What made Virginia and New York finally agree to ratify the Constitution?


The addition of Bill of Rights

made Virginia and New York finally agree to ratify the constitution.

How was the ratification of the Constitution resolved?

To get the Constitution ratified by all 13 states, the delegates to the Constitutional Convention had

to reach several compromises

. The three major compromises were the Great Compromise, the Three-Fifths Compromise, and the Electoral College. … The Electoral College settled how the president would be elected.

What were Federalist strongest arguments?

Within these documents, the Federalists argued for a strong national government and the protection of the people's rights. One of the strongest arguments expressed by the Federalists was that

the Articles of Confederation could not protect the nation and provide for its defense in an emergency

.

What are arguments for a stronger federal government?

A strong central

government could represent the nation to other countries

. It could also control individual states that would not cooperate with the rest. Federalists also believed that a strong central government could best protect individual citizens' rights and freedoms.

How did the Federalists win?

In 1787, toward the end of the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, Mason proposed that a bill of rights preface the Constitution, but his proposal was defeated. Why did the Federalists win?

Federalists seized the initiative and were better organized and politically shrewder than

Anti-federalists.

Did the federalists want a bill of rights?

Federalists argued that

the Constitution did not need a bill of rights

, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.

Amira Khan
Author
Amira Khan
Amira Khan is a philosopher and scholar of religion with a Ph.D. in philosophy and theology. Amira's expertise includes the history of philosophy and religion, ethics, and the philosophy of science. She is passionate about helping readers navigate complex philosophical and religious concepts in a clear and accessible way.