Conclusion:
Ordinary people are likely to follow orders given by an authority figure
, even to the extent of killing an innocent human being. Obedience to authority is ingrained in us all from the way we are brought up.
What did we learn from Milgram experiment?
“What Milgram’s obedience studies revealed above all was
the sheer power of social pressure
. … The fact that recent studies have replicated Milgram’s findings demonstrates that Milgram had “identified one of the universals or constants of social behavior, spanning time and place.”
What was the primary conclusion of Stanley Milgram’s obedience research?
What was the primary conclusion of Stanley Milgram’s obedience research?
Average people will harm others if told to do so by an authority figure
.
What were the results of the Milgram experiment quizlet?
Milgram concluded that
the social setting is a powerful determinant of behaviour
. We are socialised to recognise authority and to react with obedience.
What was the motivation behind Stanley milligram experimental study obedience?
Milgram wanted
to investigate whether Germans were particularly obedient to authority figures
, as this was a common explanation for the Nazi killings in World War II.
What is the major problem with the original Milgram study?
What is a major problem with the original Milgram study?
Milgram lied to his respondents, making his study borderline unethical
. What is the major flaw in the Asch conformity study? Asch ignored the importance of several factors influencing conformity- race, class, and gender.
What was Milgram’s hypothesis?
The hypothesis tested in the Milgram experiment was that,
under the right circumstances, people would follow the directions of an authority figure to the extent of harming or even killing other people
.
What are the four factors that influence obedience according to Milgram?
- Commands were given by an authority figure rather than another volunteer.
- The experiments were done at a prestigious institution.
- The authority figure was present in the room with the subject.
- The learner was in another room.
- The subject did not see other subjects disobeying commands.
Who was the first person referred to as a psychologist?
Wilhelm Wundt
(1832–1920) was a German scientist who was the first person to be referred to as a psychologist. His famous book entitled Principles of Physiological Psychology was published in 1873.
What is a perspective within psychology that emphasizes the potential for good that is innate to all humans?
Humanism
is a perspective within psychology that emphasizes the potential for good that is innate to all humans.
What are the ethical issues of the Milgram experiment?
The ethical issues involved with the Milgram experiment are as follows:
deception, protection of participants involved, and the right to withdrawal
. The experiment was deemed unethical, because the participants were led to believe that they were administering shocks to real people.
What was the purpose of the Milgram experiment quizlet?
The purpose of Milgram’s study of
obedience was to find out how many people would obey an authority figure when directly ordered to violate their own ethical standards
. In Stanley Milgram’s study of obedience, the “learners” actually received very significant levels of shock.
Why is it so many people obey when they feel coerced? Social psychologist Stanley Milgram researched the effect of authority on obedience. He
concluded people obey either out of fear or out of a desire to appear cooperative–
even when acting against their own better judgment and desires.
What was the most serious charge leveled against the Milgram experiment?
One of the more serious charges leveled against Milgram’s paper was the
original sin of social science research: sample bias
.
Is the Milgram experiment accurate?
In the 1960s, Stanley Milgram’s electric-shock studies showed that people will obey even the most abhorrent of orders. In the most well-known variation of the experiment,
a full 65 percent of people went all the way
. …
Which type of persuasion involves encouraging people to agree?
Using the foot-in-the-door technique,
the persuader
gets a person to agree to bestow a small favor or to buy a small item, only to later request a larger favor or purchase of a bigger item.
