When Investigating Fraud Investigators Should Usually?

by | Last updated on January 24, 2024

, , , ,

When investigating fraud, investigators should usually

interview suspects

: at the end of the investigation process so that they can gather sufficient evidence against them. Which of the following is NOT a method for theft investigation?

When beginning an investigation it is important that fraud examiners use techniques that will?

Question Answer When beginning an investigation, fraud examiners should use techniques that will: Not arouse Suspcion When conducting interviews during an investigation, which of the following words should usally be avoided? Investigation

What is the most common way to obtain private documents for investigation?

The four most common examples of hard-to-get documentary evidence are:

Web-based e-mail accounts

, private bank records, tax returns, and brokerage records.

Which of the following are theft Act investigation methods that usually involve observing or listening to potential perpetrators?


Surveillance and covert operations

are theft act investigative methods that usually involve observing or listening to potential perpetrators.

Which investigation technique relies on a person’s senses especially hearing and vision?

Which investigation technique relies on a person’s senses, especially hearing and seeing?

Surveillance

is usually used to investigate: Theft acts.

Why is it important to proactively detect fraud?

Why it is important to proactively detect fraud? – This type of detection can be done early and without previous indications of fraud, so

it is able to catch frauds early

. – While it can cost more to complete, it can save organizations significant amounts of money if frauds are caught early.

Who is in the best position to detect employee fraud?


Co-workers

are usually in the best position to detect fraud. Fraud perpetrators often live beyond their means since their income does not support their lifestyle.

How do you prove forged documents?

Forgery has been explained before as concerning the presence of one or other of the two elements of dishonesty or fraud. Proof: the prosecution has to prove that the:

Accused committed forgery

. That he did so with an intention that the document forged shall be used for the purpose of cheating.

What type of evidence would be the most difficult for a perpetrator to forge?


Without a confession, forged documents, or repeated fraudulent acts that establish a pattern of dishonesty

, convicting someone of fraud is often difficult.

Is the document of evidence?

Documentary evidence is

any evidence

that is, or can be, introduced at a trial in the form of documents, as distinguished from oral testimony. … Normally, before documentary evidence is admissible as evidence, it must be proved by other evidence from a witness that the document is genuine, called “laying a foundation”.

What is the term for gathering and analyzing electronic evidence?

What is the term for gathering and analyzing electronic evidence?

Computer forensics

.

Which checksum method is considered more advanced and secure than the method it replaced?


The SHA-1 checksum method

is more advanced and is considered more robust than the MD5 method.

What is used in court cases to prove that data has not been adversely affected during analysis?

What is used in court cases to prove that data has not been adversely affected during analysis? …

They are engineered so that even small changes in the source data will produce significantly different checksum results

.

What is the practice in which cash receipts are misapplied to hide fictitious receivables called?

What is the practice in which cash receipts are misapplied to hide fictitious receivables called?

Which federal agency maintains information on individuals who may be a threat to national security?

The integration of intelligence and investigations makes

the FBI

uniquely situated to address these threats and vulnerabilities across programs.

What is the difference between anomalies and fraud?

Anomaly detection is a broad term referring to any set of unusual activities, including network security breaches,

extraordinary transactions

or even mechanical breakdowns. … Fraud detection is a good example of anomaly detection for many reasons, the first being that it is incredibly costly.

Charlene Dyck
Author
Charlene Dyck
Charlene is a software developer and technology expert with a degree in computer science. She has worked for major tech companies and has a keen understanding of how computers and electronics work. Sarah is also an advocate for digital privacy and security.