When Should We Use Exploratory Factor Analysis?

by | Last updated on January 24, 2024

, , , ,

Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is generally used to discover the factor structure of a measure and to examine its internal reliability. EFA is often recommended

when researchers have no hypotheses about the nature of the underlying factor structure of their measure

.

Contents hide

Should I use exploratory or confirmatory factor analysis?

Cut-offs of factor loadings can be much lower for exploratory factor analyses. When you are developing scales, you can use an exploratory factor analysis to test a new scale, and then move on

to confirmatory factor analysis

to validate the factor structure in a new sample.

When should factor analysis be used?

The purpose of factor analysis is

to reduce many individual items into a fewer number of dimensions

. Factor analysis can be used to simplify data, such as reducing the number of variables in regression models. Most often, factors are rotated after extraction.

What types of research can use factor analysis?

  • Exploratory factor analysis.
  • Confirmatory factor analysis.
  • Structural equation modeling.

Can I do CFA without EFA?

All Answers (3)

If you have an a priori expectation of what the structure should be for a given measure, then,

yes

: you can (and should) go with CFA (confirmatory factor analysis).

How does exploratory factor analysis work?

Exploratory factor analysis is a statistical technique that is

used to reduce data to a smaller set of summary variables and to explore the underlying theoretical structure of the phenomena

. It is used to identify the structure of the relationship between the variable and the respondent.

What are the major uses of factor analysis?

Factor analysis is used to

uncover the latent structure of a set of variables

. It reduces attribute space from a large no. of variables to a smaller no. of factors and as such is a non dependent procedure.

What are the two primary purposes of factor analysis?

2 MERITS OF FACTOR ANALYSIS

The overall objective of factor analysis is

data summarization and data reduction

.

Is factor analysis Part of reliability or validity?

Statistical evidence of

validity

with Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is a statistical method that increases the reliability of the scale by identifying inappropriate items that can then be removed.

What is difference between factor analysis and PCA?

The difference between factor analysis and principal component analysis. … Factor analysis explicitly

assumes the existence of latent factors underlying the observed data

. PCA instead seeks to identify variables that are composites of the observed variables.

How factor analysis is used in market segmentation?

In the area of market segmentation, factor analysis typically

serves in the ancillary role of reducing the many variables available for the purpose of segmentation

to a core set of composite variables (factors) that are used by cluster, discriminant or logistic regression.

What is difference between EFA and CFA?

EFA, traditionally, has been used to explore the possible underlying factor structure of a set of observed variables without imposing a preconceived structure on the outcome (Child, 1990). … Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) is a statistical technique used to verify the factor structure of a set of observed variables.

How factor analysis is useful to a marketing manager?

Factor analysis in market research is often used in

customer satisfaction studies to identify underlying service dimensions

, and in profiling studies to determine core attitudes. … Factor analysis can be used to establish whether the three measures do, in fact, measure the same thing.

What does Rmsea measure?

RMSEA is an absolute fit index, in that it

assesses how far a hypothesized model is from a perfect model

. On the contrary, CFI and TLI are incremental fit indices that compare the fit of a hypothesized model with that of a baseline model (i.e., a model with the worst fit).

What is the difference between CFA and SEM?

4 Answers. SEM is an umbrella term. CFA is the measurement part of SEM, which shows relationships

between latent variables and their indicators

. The other part is the structural component, or the path model, which shows how the variables of interest (often latent variables) are related.

What are the assumptions of exploratory factor analysis?


Observed variables are continuous

, latent variables are hypothesized to be continuous. Observed are continuous, latent are categorical. Observed are categorical, latent are continuous.

What is a scree plot used for?

A scree plot is a graphical tool used

in the selection of the number of relevant components or factors to be considered in a principal components analysis or a factor analysis

.

How do you report exploratory factor analysis results?

Usually, you summarize the results of the EFA into

one table

which contains all items used for the EFA, their factor loadings and the names of the factors. Then you indicate in the notes of the table the method of extraction, the method of rotation and the cutting value of extracting factors.

How can Exploratory factor analysis help the researcher improve the results of other multivariate techniques?

(2) HOW CAN FACTOR ANALYSIS HELP THE RESEARCHER IMPROVE THE RESULTS OF OTHER MULTIVARIATE TECHNIQUES? Factor analysis

provides direct insight into the interrelationships among variables or respondents through its data summarizing perspective

.

Why factor analysis is important in data analysis?

Factor analysis

provides simplicity after reducing variables

. For long studies with large blocks of Matrix Likert scale questions, the number of variables can become unwieldy. Simplifying the data using factor analysis helps analysts focus and clarify the results.

What is factor analysis and why is it used in statistics?

Factor analysis is a

statistical method used to describe variability among observed, correlated variables in terms of a potentially lower number of unobserved variables called factors

. … Factor analysis searches for such joint variations in response to unobserved latent variables.

Does factor analysis use correlation?

Factor analysis is a technique that requires a large sample size. Factor analysis

is based on the correlation matrix of the variables involved

, and correlations usually need a large sample size before they stabilize.

Is factor analysis quantitative or qualitative?

In statistics, factor analysis of mixed data (FAMD), or factorial analysis of mixed data, is the factorial method devoted to data tables in which a group of individuals is described both by

quantitative and qualitative variables

.

What type of analysis is factor analysis?

There are two types of factor analyses,

exploratory and confirmatory

. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) is method to explore the underlying structure of a set of observed variables, and is a crucial step in the scale development process. The first step in EFA is factor extraction.

When would you not use factor analysis?

If Eigenvalues is greater than one, we should consider that a factor and if

Eigenvalues is less than one

, then we should not consider that a factor. According to the variance extraction rule, it should be more than 0.7. If variance is less than 0.7, then we should not consider that a factor.

Is exploratory factor analysis enough?

EFA could be used to establish a preliminary construct validity but if you have the theory that support the factor structure, it is better to use CFA. if you are intending to use EFA, choose common factor method (in SPSS) not PCA.

How do companies use factor analysis?

Generally, companies test variables with factor analysis in marketing research

using tools such as focus groups and surveys

, according to Qualtrics. … Companies can use this information to alter product packaging to attract more customers and sell more products.

What four factors should market research include and why?

  • Project complexity. The number and type of people you will need to staff your own research department is going to depend how complex the research projects are going to be. …
  • Frequency of research. …
  • Project alignment. …
  • Market potential.

Can we do exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis in the same data set?

It is generally a bad idea to do an EFA and a CFA on the same data for the exact reason you mention: A factor structure derived from an EFA will almost always fit very well in a CFA using the same data. EFA and CFA

are closely related

, so it is no surprise that this is the case.

What should be used to check the reliability of the factors?


Correlation between two forms

is used as the reliability index. The correlation between two separate half-length tests is used to estimate the reliability. For example, you obtained the correlation between two-halves is . 60.

Why is factor analysis better than PCA?

As said,

the mathematical model in Factor Analysis is much more conceptual than the PCA

model. Where the PCA model is more of a pragmatic approach, in Factor Analysis we are hypothesizing that latent variables exist.

How many participants do you need for factor analysis?

Usually

100-150 participants

are enough for 10-20 variables. When possible, multigroup analysis will help testing stability in different subsamples at random.

What happens if RMSEA is high?

If the RMSEA is “too high”,

the chi-square test will be significant

, too (which should guide the evalution).

What should be the value of RMSEA?

The RMSEA is usually reported and depending on your field of research should usually be

below 0.05

but some journals will permit 0.08 depending on the field. SRMR is also required since it is a different type of fit statistic and values again below 0.05 are very good but again 0.08 is also permissible.

What is RMSEA good fit?

Up until the early nineties, an RMSEA in the range of 0.05 to 0.10 was considered an indication of fair fit and values above 0.10 indicated poor fit (MacCallum et al, 1996). It was then thought that an RMSEA of between 0.08 to 0.10 provides a mediocre fit and

below 0.08 shows a good fit

(MacCallum et al, 1996).

Rachel Ostrander
Author
Rachel Ostrander
Rachel is a career coach and HR consultant with over 5 years of experience working with job seekers and employers. She holds a degree in human resources management and has worked with leading companies such as Google and Amazon. Rachel is passionate about helping people find fulfilling careers and providing practical advice for navigating the job market.