Would is a
past-tense form of will
. If you are writing about past events, you can use it to indicate something that was in the future at that point in time, but is not necessarily in the future right now. In other words, you use would to preserve the future aspect when talking about the past.
Can we use would have?
We use would have as
the past tense form of will have
: … We also use would have in conditionals to talk about something that did not happen in the past: If it had been a little warmer, we would have gone for a swim.
Can we use would have for future?
We have this in the past tense, simple past tense and then, in that past tense thought, we have some idea about the future and we use Would to express that idea about the future. … So meaning, in the past, in the far past, I knew that this would happen. Um. So we can use
Would to talk about future
but in the past.
Would VS would for future?
Would is a past-tense form of will
. If you are writing about past events, you can use it to indicate something that was in the future at that point in time, but is not necessarily in the future right now. In other words, you use would to preserve the future aspect when talking about the past.
Would we have past or future?
Would is
a past-tense form of will
. If you are writing about past events, you can use it to indicate something that was in the future at that point in time, but is not necessarily in the future right now. In other words, you use would to preserve the future aspect when talking about the past.
Should have or should has?
Should has, as its most common meaning in modern English, the sense ought as in I should go to the graduation, but I don’t see how I can. However, the older … The modal auxiliary should has a
past form
Could would Should grammar?
Just remember that could is
used to talk about something that can happen
, would is used to talk about something that will happen in an imagined situation, and should is used to talk about something that ought to happen or must happen. I hope this helps.
Which is more polite can you or could you?
To answer the question: “
could” definitely sounds slightly more polite
than “can” to a native speaker since it is less direct and more deferential as a result. “Could” is a form of “can”, so both are technically asking “are you able to…”. This is not the difference between the two.
Can future possibility examples?
Examples:
He will be able to do the shopping for you when he comes home
. They will be able to take the car if it’s raining because I don’t need it. I’ll be able to do it tomorrow.
Can you or will you?
May implies that you are asking for permission. Can implies that you are questioning somebody’s ability. Will implies that you are seeking an answer about the future.
Had been has been?
“Had been” is used to mean
that something happened in the past and has already ended
. “Have been” and “has been” are used to mean that something began in the past and has lasted into the present time.
Would and will in the same sentence?
“Will” and “would” cannot be used as substitutes for each other. Have a look at your first sentence:
I will propose [to] her if I got a chance
. The word would does not have a tense, but will is always future tense.
Is could past or present?
Could has no tenses, no participles, and no infinitive form.
There is no past tense
, but could have followed by a past participle is used for referring to something in the past that was not real, or something that may possibly have been real: I could have been killed.
Is everybody have correct?
So, is it “everyone has” or “everyone have”? The correct form
is “everyone has
.” There are very few cases where “everyone” would ever be followed by “have,” but, for the most part, you will always use the singular “has.”
Is should present tense?
2 Answers. should is the preterite
Is could of a word?
Could of is a common misspelling of the verb phrase
