Claiming that the school violated their First Amendment rights, the students took their case to
the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri in St. Louis
.
Who won the Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier case?
Decision: In 1988,
the Supreme Court
, with one vacancy, handed down a 5-3 decision in favor of the school. The Court reversed the appellate court, and said that public schools do not have to allow student speech if it is inconsistent with the schools' educational mission.
When was the case of Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier?
Claiming that the school violated their First Amendment rights, the students took their case to
the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri in St. Louis
.
Who wrote the majority decision in Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier?
majority opinion by
Byron R. White
. No. In a 5-to-3 decision, the Court held that the First Amendment did not require schools to affirmatively promote particular types of student speech.
Do you think Principal Reynolds was justified in deleting the two pages of the paper?
Furthermore, the court concluded that Reynolds was justified in deleting two full pages of the newspaper, instead of deleting only the pregnancy and divorce stories or requiring that those stories be modified to
address his
concerns, based on his “reasonable belief that he had to make an immediate decision and that …
What impact did the Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier case?
In Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier, 484 U.S. 260 (1988), the
Supreme Court held that schools may restrict what is published in student newspapers if the papers have not been established as public forums
.
Who is Cathy Kuhlmeier?
She was
the subject of the Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier U.S. Supreme Court case
. … This led to the case moving up lower courts and eventually landing on The Supreme Court. Kuhlmeier lost the case when the Court decided that there are grounds for censorship as long as there is legitimate pedagogical concern.
Why is Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier a landmark case?
Kuhlmeier et al., 484 U.S. 260 (1988), was a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that
held that public school curricular student newspapers that have not been established as forums for student expression are subject to a lower level of First Amendment protection than independent student
…
What was the Morse v Frederick case about and who won the case?
Frederick. Morse v. Frederick, case in which the U.S. Supreme Court on June 25, 2007, ruled (5–4) that
Alaskan school officials had not violated a student's First Amendment freedom of speech rights after suspending him for displaying
, at a school event, a banner that was seen as promoting illegal drug use.
Who was the plaintiff in Hazelwood v Kuhlmeier?
Plaintiffs are or were
members of a journalism class at Hazelwood East and on the staff of the Hazelwood East student newspaper, Spectrum
. Each plaintiff also holds or held a position on the Spectrum staff, such as lay-out editor, news writer, movie reviewer, feature writer, and cartoon editor.
Can a principal censor a school newspaper?
Kuhlmeier, the high court ruled that school officials can censor school-sponsored publications
if their decision is “reasonably related to a legitimate pedagogical purpose
.” This means school officials must show that they have a reasonable educational reason for censoring the material.
How did the court distinguish between the Tinker case and the present case?
The court distinguished its decision between the Tinker case and the Hazelwood case
because Tinkers case gave students the right to express their political opinions about the Vietnam War and Hazelwood was a part of the school curriculum for teaching and learning
.
Were there steps the students could have taken other than filing a lawsuit?
Were there steps the students could have taken other than filing a lawsuit?
Yes
, the students could've worked out a compromise with the principal/school before jumping to such drastic measures.
What did the Supreme Court decide in Vernonia v Acton quizlet?
Vernonia School District 47J v. Acton, (1995) was a U.S. Supreme Court decision which
upheld the constitutionality of random drug testing regimen implemented by the local public schools in Vernonia
, Oregon.
Why did the newspaper adviser give the paper to Principal Reynolds for review?
The newspaper advisor gave the paper to Principal Reynolds to review prior to
publication because it was standard procedure
. … Principal Reynolds could have had students revise the stories prior to publication, but that would most likely have delayed the paper's publication until after the end of the school year.
Are not automatically coextensive with the rights of adults in other settings?
The Supreme Court has held that the
constitutional rights of students in public school
are not automatically coextensive with the rights of adults in other settings and that the rights of students must be applied in light of the special characteristics of the school environment.
