In order to be able to determine wether the passage draw a valid conclusion a historian could look the geographical position of battles fought in WWII and determine how many of them affected rural farming towns , and after that see how many rural farming towns there are on the countries where WWII was fought and see if ...
Which action would a historian most likely take in order to determine whether the passage draws a valid conclusion Brainly?
In order to be able to determine wether the passage draw a valid conclusion a historian could look the geographical position of battles fought in WWII and determine how many of them affected rural farming towns , and after that see how many rural farming towns there are on the countries where WWII was fought and see if ...
What would lead a historian to consider two events to have a relationship?
What would lead a historian to consider two events to have a relationship? The correct answer is C, If the events happened around the same time but one did not cause the other . Explanation: A relationship of correlation in history means that two or more events are somehow associated.
When making a historical interpretation about an event is a historian?
Historians use facts gathered from primary sources of evidence and then shape them so that their audience can understand and make sense of them . This process whereby the historian makes sense of the past is called an interpretation.
Why is it important for historians to corroborate information found in a source?
Finding corroboration between sources strengthens your conclusions , especially when you are making a historical argument. When choosing sources to corroborate, pick those that are deemed particularly reliable, which adds further certainty to your claims.
What is one strategy a historian can use?
Train students in the four key strategies historians use to analyze documents: sourcing, corroboration, close reading, and contextualization . With these skills, students can read, evaluate, and interpret historical documents in order to determine what happened in the past.
What is one reason historians often interpret historical events?
What is one reason historians often interpret historical events in different ways? Historians views influence how they interpret the past . This explains the existence of different schools of thought and different approaches to historical interpretation.
What does a historian typically do immediately after forming a historical question?
What does a historian typically do immediately after forming a historical question? Discard any evidence that contradicts his or her claim about the historical question.
What do historians call the period that started at the end of the Renaissance?
The phrase “ Middle Ages ” tells us more about the Renaissance that followed it than it does about the era itself. Starting around the 14th century, European thinkers, writers and artists began to look back and celebrate the art and culture of ancient Greece and Rome.
How can history be interpreted in different ways?
Historical interpretation is the process by which we describe, analyze, evaluate, and create an explanation of past events . ... Examples of primary sources include letters and diaries; government, church, and business records; oral histories; photographs, motion pictures, and videos; maps and land records; and blueprints.”
Is it true that historical interpretation is based on the historians Judgement on how the past should be seen?
Historical interpretation is based on the historian’s judgement on how the past should be seen. Historians make sense of the past through historical interpretation. ... Interpretation of the past vary according to who reads the primary source, when it was read, and how it was read.
Where do the top historians get recognition?
A scholarly thesis, such as a PhD, is now regarded as the baseline qualification for a professional historian. However, some historians still gain recognition based on published (academic) works and the award of fellowships by academic bodies like the Royal Historical Society .
How do you know if a source is reliable in history?
- Accuracy. Verify the information you already know against the information found in the source. ...
- Authority. Make sure the source is written by a trustworthy author and/or institution. ...
- Currency. ...
- Coverage.
How do historians determine if a source is reliable answer key?
The first key points historians want to check about a source is whether the source is based on accurate knowledge and understanding . To do this, they might check whether the author was there at the time, whether the author was involved in the event, whether the author understood the overall context.
What does it mean to corroborate a source?
Corroborating is comparing a new text to another in order to check the accuracy of the evidence and the plausibility of the claims and reasons . If the two documents agree — either in fact or in reasoning and claims — then the new historical evidence is corroborated by the previous source.
When determining causation regarding a historical event historians must?
When determining causation regarding a historical event historians must what? Carr emphasized three characteristics of causation that historians should follow: 1) Assign several causes to the event, 2) prioritize the causes, and 3) work through simplifications to provide a clear narrative .
