Which best describes how Tinker v. Des Moines expanded protected speech under the First Amendment?
The decision affirmed the protection of unpopular opinions.
Why does Tinker v. Des Moines remain important precedent setting case?
Why does Tinker v. Des Moines remain an important precedent-setting case?
It protected all symbolic speech in war protests.
… It established speech rights for students.
What is the main idea of Tinker v. Des Moines?
In Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 393 U.S. 503 (1969), the Supreme Court ruled that
public school officials cannot censor student expression unless they can reasonably forecast that the speech will substantially disrupt school activities or invade the rights of others
.
Which statement best describes the precedent set by?
Answer Expert Verified. The statement that best describes the precedent set by the Supreme Court in New York Times v. United States
regarding government censorship was that Government censorship is almost always unconstitutional.
Why does the Tinker v. Des Moines case matter?
Des Moines – Landmark Supreme Court Ruling on Behalf of Student Expression. Tinker v. Des Moines is a historic Supreme Court ruling from 1969 that
cemented students’ rights to free speech in public schools
. … The students were told they could not return to school until they agreed to remove their armbands.
What was the importance of the Supreme Court case of Tinker v. Des Moines quizlet?
In 1969 the United States Supreme Court ruled in a 7-2 decision in favor of the students.
The court agreed that students rights should be protected and said
, “Students don’t shed their constitutional rights at the school house gates.”
Why is the Tinker decision considered such an important First Amendment case?
First, Tinker v. Des Moines shows how the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the First Amendment
reflects a commitment to individual liberty
. In this case, the Court affirmed that the right to free expression is more important than the need for government entities, like schools, to maintain order.
What is the Tinker test?
The substantial disruption test is a criterion set forth by the United States Supreme Court, in the leading case of Tinker v. … The test is
used to determine whether an act by a U.S. public school official (State actor) has abridged a student’s constitutionally protected First Amendment rights of free speech
.
What does incorporation mean and how does it relate to Tinker v Des Moines?
In the resulting Supreme Court case, the Court ruled that
a woman’s decision to have an abortion in the first trimester of pregnancy was protected by the constitutional right to privacy
which is incorporated to the states, and that it was therefore unconstitutional for a state to criminalize all abortions. Tinker v.
Why did the Supreme Court find their suspension unconstitutional?
The Supreme Court found their suspension unconstitutional
because the arm bands were considered “Pure Speech
.” The armbands did not cause interference with school work. … Wearing armbands counted as symbolic speech.
Why did the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the students who wore armbands?
They ruled in favor of the students. It held that armbands were
form of “speech” because the armbands were symbols representing ideas
.
What is a symbolic speech quizlet?
Symbolic Speech. used
to describe actions that purposefully and discernibly convey a particular message or statement to those viewing it
; conduct that expresses an idea. examples of symbolic speech. Sit-ins, flag waving, demonstrations, and wearing protest buttons.
What is true of a secular activity?
What is true of a secular activity?
It is compatible with all religious traditions
. It is separate from all religious traditions. It is specific to Christian religious traditions.
Why did the school district argue it could prevent students from wearing black armbands?
Because the appearance of the armbands distracted students from their work,
they detracted from the ability of the school officials to perform their duties
, so the school district was well within its rights to discipline the students.
Is the freedom of speech?
In the United States, freedom of speech and expression is strongly protected from government restrictions by
the First Amendment to the United States Constitution
, many state constitutions, and state and federal laws.
Why was Justice Black so concerned about the court’s decision in the Tinker case?
Justice Hugo Black dissented. He pointed out that the
case involved a small number of students who refused to obey the instructions of school officials
, and argued that allowing this behavior would have a negative effect on schools and on the country as a whole.
