Bounty
was the strongest and most absorbent paper towel we tried.
What is the independent variable in the paper towel experiment?
The independent variable in this experiment is the brand of paper towel i.e. it is the one the tester is changing. The independent variable is
always on the X-axis
. The average amount of water (over the 3 trials) left in the cylinder is the dependent variable and the bar should be drawn to this height.
Which paper towel brand is the strongest independent variable?
For this project i have found out the strongest paper towel between three brands;
Bounty
, Viva and Brawny. It turns out that Bounty was the strongest because it held the most quarters.
What is the most expensive paper towel brand?
However, because it’s a high-quality product,
Bounty
is the most expensive one we tested, at $. 045 per square foot.
Why is Bounty the best paper towel?
Bounty has been the
leader in absorbency
, and uses a variety of quilted patterns. … Essentially the tight stitching or quilting Bounty towel uses on all of their kitchen paper towels add more surface area to the towel. The result is more paper, and a more absorbent paper towel. That is why Bounty is so absorbent.
What is the science behind paper towel absorbency?
Paper is made of
cellulose
, which water molecules like to cling to. … Paper towels are especially absorbent because their cellulose fibers have empty spaces—tiny air bubbles—between them. Water molecules, which like to stay together, follow the one another as they are absorbed by the cellulose and fill the empty spaces.
How do you test a paper towel?
Place marbles one at a time on the wet area in the middle of the
paper towel
. Count how many marbles the paper towel holds until it breaks. Record the number of marbles each brand holds before testing another brand.
What are two variables that would affect the absorbency how much liquid it will soak up of a paper towel?
The absorbency is affected by several factors such as the material characteristics,
contact time, sheet size, liquid type, liquid temperature, surrounding temperature and humidity, and many others
.
Which is better Bounty or Sparkle?
The
Bounty towels
absorbed more of the water in the cups than the Sparkle did by a large amount. If a consumer were to have a big mess or spill, they would most likely prefer to have the Bounty towels as they can pick up and absorb more than the Sparkle towels.
Why is there a Bounty paper towel shortage?
Part of the reason for the shortage is people keep hoarding them:
there was a massive surge in sales of Bounty paper towels in July
, Procter & Gamble reported, as customers swept them off store shelves.
What is the cheapest paper towel?
Kirkland Signature Premium Big Roll
It’s the most affordable paper towel on the tally with a price tag of $1.47. But as with all things Costco, you get a lot for your money. Try 85 square feet per roll on for size!
Why is Bounty so expensive?
P&G said the two factors were outsized components in the baby, fabric, and home care cost structure. Pulp, which is made from trees, is the primary ingredient in Bounty, Puffs and Charmin, and a major material in Pampers. … primarily due to
higher pulp costs
and, secondarily, inflation in other raw materials.”
What company makes Bounty paper towels?
Best Paper Towels By Bounty |
P&G Professional
.
Which paper towel brand holds the most water?
The results of the experiment were that the
Sparkle brand paper towels
were the most absorbent. It absorbed on average, 50ml of water, when the Bounty brand paper towels absorbed only 44.75ml of water.
Which organ is similar to the paper towel?
The walls of the
small intestine
are made of muscles that squeeze food and continuously move it. It contains digestive juices and other enzymes that help break the food into nutrients.
What went through the paper towel?
The
water is being absorbed
, or soaked up, by the paper towel material through a process called capillary action. … Paper towels are permeable and porous, meaning that they contain small spaces that both liquid and air may pass through.
