In the Constitutional Convention, the Virginia Plan
Was the Virginia Plan or New Jersey plan better?
The Virginia Plan is better because it's basically saying that representation is based on the size of the state. If you have a big state and one representative, it won't work because one person can't make decisions for the whole state. The more representatives there are, the better it will be for the state.
What plan would give more power to the large states?
The Virginia Plan favored the larger states and would give them more representation because of their larger population. The Virginia Plan had a federal government that consisted of a president, courts, and a congress with two houses.
What was wrong with the New Jersey Plan?
Under the New Jersey Plan, the unicameral legislature with one vote per state was inherited from the Articles of Confederation. This position reflected the belief that the states were independent entities. Ultimately, the New Jersey Plan was rejected as a basis for a new constitution .
What was the biggest difference between the Virginia Plan and New Jersey Plan?
what was the main difference between the virginia plan and the new jersey plan? the virginia plan called for a bicameral legislature and representation would be based on population , and the new jersey plan had a unicameral legislature and each state had the same # of votes.
Which states would have been happiest with the new constitution?
The smaller states would have been happiest with the new constitution because they now have the same number number of senators as the big states.
What did small states fear?
Small states feared they would be ignored if representation was based on population while large states believed that their larger populations deserved more of a voice. Under the bicameral system, each party would be represented in a balance of power.
Why did the smaller states fear the Virginia Plan?
The smaller states opposed the Virginia Plan because the resolution for proportional representation would mean that smaller states would have less say in government than the larger states . If the Virginia Plan was agreed each state would have a different number of representatives based on the state's population.
Who opposed the New Jersey Plan and why?
The Great Compromise
Delegates from the large states were naturally opposed to the New Jersey Plan, as it would diminish their influence. The convention ultimately rejected Paterson's plan by a 7-3 vote, yet the delegates from the small states remained adamantly opposed to the Virginia plan.
Who benefited from the New Jersey Plan?
| Question Answer | Type of state that benefited from the New Jersey Plan? Small States | Delegates agreed on a bicameral congress, one segment with equal representation for states, and the other with other representation proportionate to the states population Connecticut Compromise |
|---|
Who did the New Jersey Plan benefit?
The New Jersey Plan was meant to protect the interests of the smaller states from being trampled by the larger states . The plan called for one vote per state in Congress rather than having votes based on representation, since that would benefit the larger states.
What are three similarities between the New Jersey Plan and the Virginia Plan?
What are three things that both the Virginia and New Jersey plan have in common? Virginia representation was based on population. New Jersey representation was based on equal representation . Executive, Judicial, & Legislative.
How did the Virginia plan differ from the New Jersey Plan quizlet?
How did the Virginia plan differ from the New Jersey plan? The Virginia Plan called for three branches of government and two houses of Congress . Representation in each house would be determined by population. The New Jersey Plan called for three branches of government and a single house of Congress.
Why is the Virginia plan better?
The Virginia Plan is better because it's basically saying that representation is based on the size of the state . If you have a big state and one representative, it won't work because one person can't make decisions for the whole state. The more representatives there are, the better it will be for the state.
Which state benefited most from the Three-Fifths Compromise?
The Three-Fifths Compromise, reached during the Constitutional Convention in 1787, benefited slave states .
Which states benefited the most under the 3/5 compromise?
Counting the whole number of slaves benefited the Southern states and reinforced the institution of slavery. Minimizing the percentage of the slave population counted for apportionment reduced the political power of slaveholding states.
