Developed by
psychotherapist Carl Rogers
and adapted to rhetoric by writing scholars Young, Becker, and Pike, the speaker seeks compromise, acknowledging positive aspects of each party’s argument to arrive at a mutually-beneficial solution to an issue.
Where did the Rogerian argument come from?
The Rogerian model of argument was
adapted from the work of American psychologist Carl Rogers by the composition scholars Richard Young, Alton Becker, and Kenneth Pike in their textbook “Rhetoric: Discovery and Change”
(1970).
What are Rogerian arguments based on?
The Rogerian argument finds that middle ground. Based on
the work of psychologist Carl Rogers
(pictured on the right), a Rogerian argument focuses on finding a middle ground between the author and the audience.
How did Aristotle categorize an argument?
The Aristotelian or classical argument is a style of argument developed by the famous Greek philosopher and rhetorician, Aristotle. … Although ethos, pathos, and logos play a role in any argument, this style of argument utilizes them in the
most persuasive ways possible
.
What are the two steps to a Rogerian argument?
- I. Introduction. Discuss the issue, what’s at stake and any context required for your readers to understand the argument.
- II. Explain the Opposing View. …
- III. Describe Your Views. …
- IV. Find Common Ground. …
- V. Offer a Compromise.
How do you end a Rogerian argument?
The conclusion of an essay includes a summary of your paper. For a Rogerian article, you need to
concisely present a review of the sturdiest points from both sides of the argument and come up with a resolution which satisfies
both sides of the argument.
When was the Rogerian argument created?
In the study and teaching of rhetoric and argumentation, the term Rogerian argument was popularized
in the 1970s and 1980s
by the 1970 textbook Rhetoric: Discovery and Change by the University of Michigan professors Richard E. Young, Alton L. Becker, and Kenneth L. Pike.
What are the four claims for written argument?
Arguments can be divided into four general components:
claim, reason, support, and warrant
. Claims are statements about what is true or good or about what should be done or believed. Claims are potentially arguable.
What are the Rogerian techniques?
Rogerian therapy, created by Carl Rogers, is a
therapeutic technique in which the client takes an active, autonomous role in therapy sessions
. It is based on the idea that the client knows what is best, and that the therapist’s role is to facilitate an environment in which the client can bring about positive change.
What are the four parts to a standard Rogerian argument?
A Rogerian argument typically includes four parts:
an introduction that includes the full argumentative landscape
, with all positions fairly represented in such a way that the writer demonstrates understanding of and respect for the range of perspectives involved; a rehearsal of situations in which the writer can …
What is a category according to Aristotle?
The Categories (Greek Κατηγορίαι Katēgoriai; Latin Categoriae or Praedicamenta) is
a text from Aristotle’s Organon that enumerates all the possible kinds of things that can be the subject or the predicate of a proposition
. They are “perhaps the single most heavily discussed of all Aristotelian notions”.
What is reasoning according to Aristotle?
In order to study and question completely, Aristotle viewed
logic as the basic means of reasoning
. … its formal cause, or its design; its efficient cause, or its creator; and its final cause, or its reason for being. Aristotle agreed with his mentor, Plato, concerning the field of ethics.
What are the 10 categories of Aristotle?
Aristotle posits 10 categories of existing things:
substance, quantity, quality, relation, place, time, position, doing, having, and being affected
. Each of these terms was defined by Aristotle in pretty much the same way we would define it today, the one exception being substance.
When should you use a Rogerian argument?
Rogerian arguments are oftentimes used in
essays such as position papers
. One advantage of using Rogerian argumentation is that the writer or speaker gains the attention of the audience and prevents them from immediately arguing in opposition.
How many paragraphs are in a Rogerian argument?
As opposed to the traditional
5-paragraph
essay, which has three main points as the body paragraphs, the Rogerian essay focuses on trying to work out the main arguments of each side. The first body paragraph should focus on one side of the argument, and the second paragraph should focus on the other side.
What is the difference between classical and Rogerian argument?
Traditional Argument: Writer states the claim and gives reasons to prove it. Writer refutes the opponent by showing what is wrong or invalid. Rogerian Argument: The writer states
opponent’s claim to demonstrate understanding and shows how its valid
.
