Patriot leaders organized a funeral procession for the five who were killed. Paul Revere produced the engraving shown here of the Boston Massacre. It was used as propaganda (something used to help or harm a cause or individual)
to demand the removal of British troops from Boston.
How was the Boston Massacre used as propaganda?
Coined the “Fatal Fifth of March,” the massacre was used as
propaganda by patriots to bring people to their side against British tyranny
. The use of it as propaganda caused the Boston Massacre to stand out against the many events that led to the American Revolution.
What does the Boston Massacre represent?
The Boston Massacre was
a signal event leading to the Revolutionary War
. It led directly to the Royal Governor evacuating the occupying army from the town of Boston. It would soon bring the revolution to armed rebellion throughout the colonies.
How did the British view the Boston Massacre?
Patriots argued the event was
the massacre of civilians perpetrated by the British Army
, while loyalists argued that it was an unfortunate accident, the result of self-defense of the British soldiers from a threatening and dangerous mob.
Is Paul Revere’s engraving of the Boston Massacre a primary source?
A Spotlight on a Primary Source by Paul Revere. … Produced just three weeks after the Boston Massacre, Paul Revere’s historic engraving “
The Bloody Massacre in King-Street
” was probably the most effective piece of war propaganda in American history.
Why does the Boston Massacre matter?
The event in Boston helped to unite the colonies against Britain. What started as a minor fight became a turning point in the beginnings of the American Revolution. The Boston
Massacre helped spark the colonists’ desire for American independence
, while the dead rioters became martyrs for liberty.
Why is there a dog in the Boston Massacre picture?
There appears to be a sniper in the window beneath the “Butcher’s Hall” sign.
Dogs tend to symbolize loyalty and fidelity
. The dog in the print is not bothered by the mayhem behind him and is staring out at the viewer. The sky is illustrated in such a way that it seems to cast light on the British “atrocity.”
How did the Boston Massacre end?
Eight soldiers, one officer, and four civilians were arrested and charged with murder, and they were defended by future U.S. President John Adams. Six of the soldiers were acquitted; the other two were
convicted of manslaughter
and given reduced sentences.
What was the purpose for the Boston Tea Party?
The midnight raid, popularly known as the “Boston Tea Party,” was in protest of the British Parliament’s Tea Act of 1773, a bill designed
to save the faltering East India Company by greatly lowering its tea tax and granting it a virtual monopoly on the American tea trade
.
Who was responsible for the Boston Massacre?
Tensions began to grow, and in Boston in February 1770 a patriot mob attacked a
British
loyalist, who fired a gun at them, killing a boy. In the ensuing days brawls between colonists and British soldiers eventually culminated in the Boston Massacre.
What was the political impact of the Boston Tea Party?
The event was the
first major act of defiance to British rule over the colonists
. It showed Great Britain that Americans wouldn’t take taxation and tyranny sitting down, and rallied American patriots across the 13 colonies to fight for independence.
How did the British respond to the Boston Tea Party?
The Boston Tea Party caused considerable property damage and infuriated the British government.
Parliament responded with the Coercive Acts of 1774
, which colonists came to call the Intolerable Acts.
What was the Boston Massacre primary sources?
- Engraving by Paul Revere – 1770.
- Engraving by Henry Pelham – 1770.
- Engraving by Anonymous – 1770 in London.
- Engraved Broadside by W. Bingley of London – 1770.
- Boston Massacre by W. L. Champney – 1856.
- Massachusetts Historical Society – Boston Massacre Imagery Comparison Page.
Do you think Paul Revere was a patriot or a loyalist?
Paul Revere was an American silversmith and
a patriot in the American Revolution
. He is most famous for alerting Colonial militia of British invasion before the Battles of Lexington and Concord.
