Why would a political scientist wish to consult multiple sources of information on a topic?
To corroborate a primary source's claim about an event
. … Answer: To corroborate a primary source's claim about an event. This is a very important aspect of the historian's job.
What is true about using multiple sources of information on a topic apex?
What is true about using multiple sources of information on a topic? A.
The sources will all agree with each other if they are objective
.
What does corroborating sources allow a political scientist to do apex?
Ideas spread to influence public opinion for or against a cause. What does corroborating Sources allow political scientists to do?
A form of government in which citizens rule directly and not through representatives
, A form of democracy in which all people gather together to make decisions.
Which is true about using multiple sources of information on a topic?
What is true about using multiple sources of information on a topic? Answer Expert Verified The answer to this question is
The more sources there
are to corroborate a conclusion, the more likely that conclusion is to be true.
What makes a source credible?
Generally, a credible or reliable source is
one that experts in your subject domain would agree is valid for your purposes
. … It is important to critically evaluate sources because using credible/reliable sources makes you a more informed writer.
What is the importance of corroboration of sources in today's setting?
Finding corroboration between sources
strengthens your conclusions
, especially when you are making a historical argument. When choosing sources to corroborate, pick those that are deemed particularly reliable, which adds further certainty to your claims.
When should you question a source's credibility apex?
Answer: D.
When you cannot find any other sources that support its arguments
. Explanation: A credible source is the one whose information involving the findings and results are unbiased.
Why is it important to use multiple sources in research?
Using
a variety of sources can diminish the effects of bias
—the preference of one view over another. … If blatant bias is present in a source, compensate for it with viewpoints from other sources. Using multiple perspectives in this way will help you create a well-rounded source other researchers can use.
What is one advantage a primary source has over a secondary?
One advantage that a primary source has over a secondary source is that
it can be created when the event was fresh in the person's mind
.
What is one advantage a secondary source?
Advantages: Secondary sources
provide a variety of expert perspectives and insights
. Also, peer review usually ensures the quality of sources such as scholarly articles. Finally, researching secondary sources is more efficient than planning, conducting, and analyzing certain primary forms of research.
How do you choose a credible source?
- Timeliness. Your resources need to be recent enough for your topic. …
- Authority. Does the information come from an author or organization that has authority to speak on your topic? …
- Audience. …
- Relevance. …
- Perspective.
How do you know a source is credible?
- Be skeptical. …
- Examine the source's and author's credentials and affiliations. …
- Evaluate what sources are cited by the author. …
- Make sure the source is up-to-date. …
- Check the endorsements and reviews that the source received. …
- Check if the publisher of the source is reputable.
Why is it important to use credible sources?
It is important to use credible sources in an academic research paper
because your audience will expect you to have backed up your assertions with credible evidence
. … Using evidence that does not come from a credible source of information will not convince your reader that your claim is plausible or even correct.
What are the 4 questions within corroboration?
- What do other documents say?
- Do the documents agree? If not, why?
- What are other possible documents?
- What documents are most reliable?
What does it mean to corroborate a source?
Corroborating is
comparing a new text to another in order to check the accuracy of the evidence and the plausibility of the claims and reasons
. If the two documents agree — either in fact or in reasoning and claims — then the new historical evidence is corroborated by the previous source.
Why is it important to corroborate sources when investigating a specific event?
Each type of
source may emphasize different evidence as it communicates the central idea to the reader
.
