Grutter
alleged that the school made race a “predominate” factor in admissions decisions and that the school intentionally discriminated against whites, and that this violated the Fourteenth Amendment
, which forbids states from denying “to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the law.” In its …
What did the Supreme Court decide in Grutter v Bollinger?
Bollinger, a case decided by the United States Supreme Court on June 23, 2003, upheld the affirmative action admissions policy of the University of Michigan Law School. The decision
permitted the use of racial preference in student admissions to promote student diversity
.
Why did the US Supreme Court rule that the undergraduate admissions process at the University of Michigan was unconstitutional in 2003 quizlet?
In a 6-3 opinion delivered by Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, the Court held that
the University of Michigan's use of racial preferences in undergraduate admissions violates both the Equal Protection Clause and Title VI
.
When did Barbara Grutter apply to law school?
Answer: Barbara applied to the Law School in
December 1996
, at age 43, for admission to the class entering in the fall of 1997.
What was the majority opinion in Grutter v Bollinger?
5–4 decision
In a 5-4 opinion delivered by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, the Court held that the Equal Protection Clause does not prohibit the Law School's narrowly tailored use of race in admissions decisions to further a compelling interest in obtaining the educational benefits that flow from a diverse student body.
What was the ruling in the Michigan case of Grutter v Bollinger quizlet?
Bollinger was a ruling that stated adding points due to race in the university admission point system was unconstitutional. The ruling was
against the University of Michigan's undergraduate admission
.
Who was Bollinger?
President Bollinger is
Columbia's first Seth Low Professor of the University
, a member of the Columbia Law School faculty, and one of the nation's foremost First Amendment scholars. Each fall semester, he teaches “Freedom of Speech and Press” to Columbia undergraduate students.
When a University uses race as a factor in admissions decisions this is known as?
Bakke (1978), the Court ruled unconstitutional a university's use of racial “
quotas
” in its admissions process, but held that affirmative action programs could be constitutional in some circumstances. In Regents of University of California v.
What is the likely effect of the Court's ruling in the Bakke case?
According to the quote, what is the likely effect of the Court's ruling in the Bakke case?
Colleges can consider race but cannot use strict racial quotas in admission practices
.
What factors led the Supreme Court to weaken affirmative action laws?
What has caused the Supreme Court to weaken affirmative action laws?
The Court decided that affirmative action policies must survive strict scrutiny
. Some affirmative action policies violated the Fourteenth Amendment.
What is a good LSAT score?
Anyone who successfully completes the LSAT receives a score
between 120 and 180
. “In general, scores in the high 160s and 170s are usually considered very competitive,” she says.
What are the negatives of affirmative action?
The harms of affirmative action are clear.
Academic mismatch perpetuates low grades and high dropout rates
for minority students who need a racial preference to gain admission. Basing admissions on race rather than merit also contributes to the dearth of minorities in STEM fields.
What step did both Jennifer Gratz and Barbara Grutter take after getting rejected from admission to the University of Michigan?
What step did both Jennifer Gratz and Barbara Grutter take after getting rejected from admission to the University of Michigan?
They sued the school.
What did the court case of Gratz vs Bollinger say in 2003?
Bollinger was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the University of Michigan
undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy
. In a 6-3 decision announced on June 23, 2003, the Supreme Court ruled that the university's point system was too mechanistic and therefore unconstitutional.
What test was used in Grutter v Bollinger?
Bollinger (2003) | PBS. In twin cases involving affirmative action policies at the University of Michigan, the Court upheld
the use of race as an admissions factor to
the Law School, but struck an undergraduate admissions policy that awarded “points” to minority applicants. In the cases Grutter v.
