Who Investigates Research Misconduct? Research institutions will notify the funding agency (or agencies in some cases) of an allegation of research misconduct if (1) the allegation involves Federally funded research (or an application for Federal funding) and meets the Federal definition of research misconduct given above, and (2) if the institution’s … Who is responsible
Why Are Papers Retracted? The majority of retractions were due to some form of misconduct (102 articles, 76%), that is, compromised peer review (44 articles, 33%), plagiarism (22 articles, 16%) and data falsification/fabrication (10 articles, 7%). … Conclusions The most common reason to retract was compromised peer review. What causes a paper to be retracted?
Which Type Of Research Misconduct Most Likely Occurred If Someone? Which type of research misconduct most likely occurred if someone intentionally removes data points from the data set in order to generate a deceptive conclusion? This situation most likely involves falsification. Falsification includes deceptively changing or omitting data. Which of the following is considered to
Why Do Researchers Falsify Data? Falsification of Data – also known as fudging or massaging the data in order to achieve a required outcome that differs from the actual results. Fabrication – when the experiments, the data, or the entire research study (known as “drylabbing”) are made up. Why do researchers use falsification? Falsification in
Who Is Responsible For Scientific Misconduct? In most cases, authors will be expected to take joint responsibility for the integrity of the research and its reporting. However, if authors take responsibility only for certain aspects of the research and its reporting, this should be specified in the publication. What are the 3 types of research
Why High Profile Journals Have More Retractions? One possibility, they write, is that researchers might be more willing to cut corners or even commit scientific misconduct to get into a prestigious journal. They also note that papers in high-impact journals probably receive more scrutiny, making problematic articles harder to hide. When should an article be
Is Peer Review Foolproof? Peer review is generally regarded as the gold standard in academic research quality. It is a system which has been tried and tested for centuries. It works. However, it is not foolproof. Does peer reviewing work? Some reviewers did not spot any, and most reviewers spotted only about a quarter. Peer
Which Of The Following Is True Regarding Research Misconduct? Which of the following is true regarding research misconduct? Federal funding agencies typically rely on an institution to make the initial response to an allegation of research misconduct. … To have a misconduct finding, the action must have been committed intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly. What are
Why Do Scientists Commit Misconduct? A range of possible reasons were posited: (1) career and funding pressures, (2) institutional failures of oversight, (3) commercial conflicts of interest, (4) inadequate training, (5) erosion of standards of mentoring, and (6) part of a larger pattern of social deviance. Why is scientific misconduct important? The consequences of scientific
Which Of The Following Is True Regarding Academic Industry Collaborations? Which of the following is true regarding academic-industry collaborations? The industry sponsor typically owns the data from research that it funds. … It allows institutions to have control over the intellectual property from federally-funded research. Which of the following is true regarding research misconduct? Which