- even if moral commands in the Bible come from God, we cannot tell whether they are as God gave them – no original version of any Old Testament book.
- Bible contains what most people would consider to be immoral commands; such as views towards slavery and homosexual behaviour.
Which of the following statements is a criticism of the divine command theory?
The Divine Command Theory makes God’s actions morally arbitrary. Which of the following statements is a criticism of the Divine Command Theory? …
The idea of moral progress is impossible.
What are the main objections to divine command theory?
These objections include
the Euthyphro problem, the arbitrariness objection, the autonomy objection
, the prior obligations objection (often called the Cudworth objection), the supervenience objection, and an objection based on the fact that God’s commands must be made known or promulgated.
Is the divine command theory plausible?
Although Christianity does not entail divine command theory, people commonly associate the two.
DCT can be a plausible theory to Christians
because the traditional conception of God as the creator of the universe parallels the idea that he created moral truths.
How does divine command theory define good?
The theory asserts that
good actions are morally good as a result of their being commanded by God
, and many religious believers subscribe to some form of divine command theory. Because of these premises, adherents believe that moral obligation is obedience to God’s commands; what is morally right is what God desires.
What is Contractarianism theory?
The moral theory of contractarianism
claims that moral norms derive their normative force from the idea of contract or mutual agreement
. … Thus, individuals are not taken to be motivated by self-interest but rather by a commitment to publicly justify the standards of morality to which each will be held.
What are some examples of divine command theory?
In response, divine command theorists have argued that they can still make sense of God’s goodness, by pointing out that he possesses traits which are good as distinguished from being morally obligatory. For example,
God may be disposed to love human beings, treat them with compassion, and deal with them fairly.
What is divine command theory essay?
The Divine command theory is
a meta – ethical theory which states that an action is obligatory if and only if, it is commanded by God
. In this essay, I will examine whether any form of divine command theory is defensible. … This suggests that no action can be held as being morally good unless God commands it.
What is divine nature theory?
The Divine Nature Theory concisely argues
that the nature of God is what is morally good
. … However, because God has made His nature known through the Bible and nature, people could know what is morally good. Therefore, His revelations teach what is morally good.
What is the difference between Divine Command Theory and natural law theory?
The difference is this: Divine Command Theory simply claims that
good deeds are those approved by God and wicked deeds are those that God forbids
, while Natural Law Theory says that God invested the world, and us, with a certain purpose, and our task is to use reason to discover and fulfill that purpose.
What is Emotivism theory?
Emotivism, In metaethics (see ethics),
the view that moral judgments do not function as statements of fact but rather as expressions of the speaker’s or writer’s feelings
.
Who supported the divine command theory?
Both
Martin Luther and John Calvin
advocated an ethics of divine commands. John Locke and William Paley are among the modern philosophers who argued for divine command theories. Søren Kierkegaard’s Works of Love (1847/1995) contains a divine command theory.
What are the strengths of utilitarianism?
Another strength of Utilitarianism is its
emphasis on neutrality
. When making a decision, one is to take a ‘God’s eye’ view of things, and consider everyone equally. This emphasis on neutrality makes Utilitarianism an impartial moral theory, meaning it considers everyone’s status and interests as equal.
What is an example of Contractarianism?
A contractarian approach to problems of ethics asks what solution could be agreed upon by contracting parties, starting from certain idealized positions (for example,
no ignorance
, no inequalities of power enabling one party to force unjust solutions upon another, no malicious ambitions).
Why is Contractarianism a form of Proceduralism?
Why is contractarianism a form of proceduralism? Proceduralism is
the view that we can justify our basic moral views by coming up with a procedure that will tell us the steps from distinguishing right from wrong
. … Correct moral codes emerge from the result of that procedure.
What were Rousseau’s main ideas?
Rousseau believed
modern man’s enslavement to his own needs
was responsible for all sorts of societal ills, from exploitation and domination of others to poor self-esteem and depression. Rousseau believed that good government must have the freedom of all its citizens as its most fundamental objective.
