As Bersoff pointed out, one of the major problems with the Tarasoff decision is that
it requires therapists to decide how the seriousness of the threat being made
.
What was the Tarasoff decision?
In 1985, the California legislature codified the Tarasoff rule: California law now provides that
a psychotherapist has a duty to protect or warn a third party only if the therapist actually believed or predicted
that the patient posed a serious risk of inflicting serious bodily injury upon a reasonably identifiable …
What are the major implications of the Tarasoff case?
In the Tarasoff case, the court held that a psychotherapist, to whom a patient had confided a murderous intent, had a duty to protect the intended victim from harm. This duty includes
warning the third party at risk
, among other interventions.
What is the importance of the Tarasoff case quizlet?
Terms in this set (11)
it specified that
psychotherapists have a duty to use reasonable care to protect identifiable, potential victims from clients in psychotherapy
who threaten violence.
Is Tarasoff still good law?
In 2013, legislation went into effect clarifying that the Tarasoff duty in
California is now unambiguously solely a duty to protect
. Warning the potential victim and the police is not a requirement, but a clinician can obtain immunity from liability by using this safe harbor.
Who killed Tarasoff?
TOBRINER, J. On October 27, 1969,
Prosenjit Poddar
killed Tatiana Tarasoff. fn. 1 Plaintiffs, Tatiana’s parents, allege that two months earlier Poddar confided his intention to kill Tatiana to Dr.
Why is the Tarasoff case important?
The Tarasoff case
imposed a liability on all mental health professionals to protect a victim from violent acts
. … Duty to warn means that the social worker must verbally tell the intended victim that there is a foreseeable danger of violence.
What happened to Tarasoff?
In October, after Tarasoff had returned, Poddar stopped seeing Moore. Poddar then befriended Tarasoff’s brother and moved in with him. Several weeks later, on October 27, 1969, Poddar carried out the
plan he had confided to Moore, stabbing and killing Tarasoff
.
Is the Tarasoff law in all states?
| Implementation State | No duty required Maine, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota | Other Delaware, Georgia, Illinois |
|---|
Which of the following is true concerning dual relationships?
The following is true concerning dual relationships:
Counselors need to make every effort to avoid dual relationships with clients that could impair professional judgment
or increase the risk of harm to clients.
When past recollection recorded is used at trial the witness who made a report must testify quizlet?
When Past Recollection Recorded is used at trial, the witness who made a report must testify:
insufficient memory of the incident but has knowledge indicating the report is accurate.
What was the main focus of the Hoffman report published in 2015?
The Hoffman Report is the informal name for the 2015
investigation into the American Psychological Association’s (APA) practices regarding its relaxing of ethical standards for psychologists involved in torture interrogations
.
What is the criteria for duty to warn?
The duty to warn arises when a patient has communicated
an explicit threat of imminent serious physical harm or death to a clearly identified or identifiable victim
or victims, and the patient has the apparent intent and ability to carry out such a threat.
What is the difference between duty to warn and duty protect?
The duty to warn refers to a counselor’s obligation to warn identifiable victims. The duty to protect is a
counselor’s duty to reveal confidential client information in the event that the counselor has reason to believe that a third party may be harmed
.
Is Florida a tarasoff state?
Florida has
traditionally been one of the states that had a permissive Tarasoff-like statute for notifying both potential victims and law enforcement
when, in the clinical judgment of the psychiatrist, “the patient has the apparent capability to commit such an act and that it is more likely than not that in the near …
What is Tarasoff II?
Regents of the University of California (Tarasoff II)
imposed upon psychotherapists in California a legal duty to protect third parties from harmful acts perpetrated by their patients
, even if the protective intervention requires a breach of the patient’s confidentiality.
