What was an argument used in favor of dropping atomic bombs on Japan?
It would prevent high casualties that would be caused by an invasion of Mainland Japan
.
What was an argument used in favor of dropping atomic bombs in Japan?
Originally Answered: What was an argument used in favor of dropping the atomic bomb?
To end the war and prevent the need to invade Japan on the ground.
What was an arguments in favor of dropping the atomic bomb?
Supporters of the bombings generally believe that
they prevented an invasion of the Japanese mainland
, saving more lives than they took by doing so. Opponents contend, among other arguments, that the bombings were unnecessary to win the war or that they constituted a war crime or genocide.
What is the strongest argument for the US decision to drop atomic bombs on Japan?
Truman stated that his decision to drop the
bomb was purely military
. A Normandy-type amphibious landing would have cost an estimated million casualties. Truman believed that the bombs saved Japanese lives as well. Prolonging the war was not an option for the President.
What arguments are offered against dropping first nuclear bomb on Japan?
Others have argued against the use of the bombs, with evidence such as: it was not needed, it was inhumane and it
led to the modern atomic age and threat of nuclear war
. Still others argue that perhaps the first bomb used against Hiroshima was justified but that the second used against Nagasaki was not.
Why did US bomb Japan quizlet?
Truman
wanted to avoid an invasion of Japan
. Truman hoped that the use of the bomb would and it’s astonishing effects would be enough for Japan to surrender and they would not have to invade them. The US dropped the bombs at Hiroshima and Nagasak.
Why did supporters of using the atomic bomb reject the idea of dropping on a deserted island?
Why did supporters of using the atomic bomb reject the idea of dropping one on a deserted island?
They thought the radioactive fallout was too dangerous. They thought it would make Japan fight even harder
.
Which of the following is a common argument against US decision to drop the atomic bomb?
which of the following is a common argument against the U.S. decision to drop the Atomic bomb ?
The Japanese were more willing to surrender than the U.S. military thought.
Which of the following arguments decided the debate over using the atomic bomb?
Which of the following arguments decided the debate over using the atomic bomb against Japan in 1945? …
Using the bomb would shorten the war and avoid heavy casualties among invading troops.
Why the atomic bomb was necessary?
Official A-Bomb Justification: Save US Lives
According to Truman and others in his administration, the use of the atomic bomb was
intended to cut the war in the Pacific short
, avoiding a U.S. invasion of Japan and saving hundreds of thousands of American lives.
Why did the United States drop an atomic bomb on Hiroshima quizlet?
Why did the United States decide to drop the atomic bomb on Hiroshima? The US dropped the bomb
because Truman knew it would destroy an entire city and it would save American lives because
they would not have to go fight to take over the city. … The Americans could have sent troops in but at what coast.
What was the main effect of dropping the atomic bomb on Japan?
The uranium bomb detonated over Hiroshima on 6 August 1945 had an explosive yield equal to 15,000 tonnes of TNT. It razed and burnt around 70 per cent of all buildings and caused an estimated 140,000 deaths by the end of 1945, along with
increased rates of cancer and chronic disease among the survivors
.
Why did the US decide to bomb Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
President Harry S. Truman, warned by some of his advisers that any
attempt to invade Japan would result in horrific American casualties
, ordered that the new weapon be used to bring the war to a speedy end. On August 6, 1945, the American bomber Enola Gay dropped a five-ton bomb over the Japanese city of Hiroshima.
What were alternatives to dropping the atomic bomb?
President Truman had four options: 1) continue conventional bombing of Japanese cities; 2) invade Japan; 3)
demonstrate the bomb on an unpopulated island
; or, 4) drop the bomb on an inhabited Japanese city.
What were the reasons the bomb should have not been used on Japan?
What were the reasons the bomb should not have been used on Japan? The reason japan should not have been bombed is
because many civilian lives were taken who had nothing to do with the war
. The U.S. dropping the bomb on japan killed many people and left their land in shambles.
Why did some scientists believe that it was immoral to drop the atomic bomb on Japan?
Some scientists claimed that it would be
immoral to use the weapon without warning Japan first
. However, those in favor of the bomb claimed it would save American lives and that it needed to be used in order to justify the cost of building it. What was Truman’s view towards the bomb being dropped?
Was dropping the atomic bombs on Japan the right decision?
“No.
The dropping of the atomic bomb on Hiroshima
was justified at the time as being moral
– in order to bring about a more rapid victory and prevent the deaths of more Americans. However, it was clearly not moral to use this weapon knowing that it would kill civilians and destroy the urban milieu.
Which of the following best describes one contribution of the Tuskegee Airmen during World War II?
Which of the following best describes one contribution of the Tuskegee Airmen during World War II? They flew missions over the US.
Why was the decision made to drop the atomic bomb on Japan quizlet?
Truman’s decision to order the dropping of the atomic bomb on Japan was
based largely on the desire to end the war quickly with the fewest number of casualties possible
. … President Truman was attending a conference in London with allied leaders in May of 1945 when he learned of the success of the first atomic bomb test.
Why did the United States drop atomic bombs on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 quizlet?
The United States dropped two atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945,
bringing about the surrender of Japan and the end of World War II in the Pacific
. … Emperor Hirohito of Japan ignored the ultimatum, which led to the decision to drop the atomic bombs.
Which of the following best describes one contribution of the Tuskegee Airmen during World War II quizlet?
Which of the following best describes one contribution of the Tuskegee Airmen during World war II?
They flew combat missions over Germany
. which of the following is true of Great Britain’s participation in World War II in 1940?
Which of the following best describes the aftermath of the 1938 Munich agreement quizlet?
Which of the following best describes the aftermath of the 1938 Munich Agreement?
Hitler had the confidence to launch further invasions of European countries
. What impact did the US development of the atomic bomb have on World War II?
Which of the following is a common argument in favor of the development of nuclear weapons quizlet?
Which of the following is a common argument in favor of the development of nuclear weapons?
This development paved the way for non-military use of nuclear energy.
What is the best explanation for why the United States decided to target Hiroshima 5 points?
What is the best explanation for why the United States decided to target Hiroshima?
It was a center of communications, military command, and supply point for the Japanese army
. It would have few casualties because it was nearly destroyed by previous bombings.
Why didn’t America drop the atomic bomb on Germany?
During WWII, the US bombed Germany with conventional bombs for years. The only reason that the US did not use the atomic bomb against Germany was
because the A-bomb was not ready when they officially surrendered
. Germany surrendered to the allies on May 7, 1945.
Was the dropping of the atomic bomb necessary?
More than 55,000 Americans had already died fighting the Japanese in the Pacific. An invasion was certain to be very costly in American lives. … The bomb was
necessary to accomplish Truman’s primary objectives of forcing a prompt Japanese surrender and saving American lives
, perhaps thousands of them.
What were the impacts of the atomic bomb?
After six years of war the first atomic bombs were dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945.
More than 100,000 people were killed
, and others subsequently died of radiation-induced cancers. The bombing brought the Second World War to an end.
What was the immediate effects of dropping an atomic bomb in Hiroshima?
In August 1945 the United States dropped atomic bombs (A-bombs) on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. The bomb used on the city of Hiroshima, which had an estimated pop- ulation of 330,000, was dropped on August 6, 1945.
What was the impact of using the atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki quizlet?
Atomic bombs were dropped on Hiroshima (August 6, 1945) and Nagasaki (August 9).
About two-thirds of Hiroshima was destroyed immediately
; between 45,000-90,000 people were killed almost immediately. About half of Nagasaki was destroyed immediately; around 40,000 people were killed almost immediately.
Would the Japanese have surrendered without the bomb?
Yes, Japan could have been defeated without the use of atomic weapons
. The plan to defeat Japan was Operation Downfall – Wikipedia which involved invading the Japanese home islands starting in November 1945 and continued through 1946.
Why Hiroshima bombing is ethical?
The bombing was justifiable as it applied to the
ethical school of utilitarianism
– the greatest good for the greatest number of people. If there had been a Japanese/American war the effects would have been more severe. It was unethical as civilians were killed and injured and there was no direct need for the attack.
What were two proposed alternatives to dropping the bombs on Japan?
There were four:
Offer the Japanese conditional surrender by softening the surrendering terms
.
Wait for the Soviets to attack Japanese
-held Manchuria and Korea in the hope that the Japanese would realize the futility of continuing fighting. Naval blockade and conventional strategic bombing.
Truman
at the Potsdam Conference. The letter explicitly notes that this order was approved by Marshall and Secretary of War Henry Stimson. Truman, of course, provided the ultimate authorization for dropping the bomb.
