In 1985, the California legislature codified the Tarasoff rule: California law now provides that
a psychotherapist has a duty to protect or warn a third party only if the therapist actually believed or predicted
that the patient posed a serious risk of inflicting serious bodily injury upon a reasonably identifiable …
What was the basic decision in the Tarasoff case?
In the Tarasoff case, the court held that a psychotherapist, to whom a patient had confided a murderous intent,
had a duty to protect the intended victim from harm
. This duty includes warning the third party at risk, among other interventions.
Is Tarasoff still good law?
In 2013, legislation went into effect clarifying that the Tarasoff duty in
California is now unambiguously solely a duty to protect
. Warning the potential victim and the police is not a requirement, but a clinician can obtain immunity from liability by using this safe harbor.
What happened to Tarasoff?
In October, after Tarasoff had returned, Poddar stopped seeing Moore. Poddar then befriended Tarasoff’s brother and moved in with him. Several weeks later, on October 27, 1969, Poddar carried out the
plan he had confided to Moore, stabbing and killing Tarasoff
.
What factors must therapists consider when deciding whether they must use the Tarasoff rule?
In assessing this risk level, clinicians should be aware of state requirements that affect how this threshold is set:
whether the victim must be identifiable
(most states); whether the threat must be imminent (most states); or whether the threat need not be imminent but must be serious (few states).
Who killed Tarasoff?
On Oct. 27, 1969,
Poddar
stabbed and killed Tarasoff at her home. After the killing, Poddar called the police, confessed and asked to be handcuffed. Tarasoff’s parents sued Moore and other employees of the University, in a legal action that would be memorialized as Tarasoff v.
Why is the Tarasoff case important?
The Tarasoff case
imposed a liability on all mental health professionals to protect a victim from violent acts
. … Duty to warn means that the social worker must verbally tell the intended victim that there is a foreseeable danger of violence.
Is the tarasoff law in all states?
| Implementation State | No duty required Maine, Nevada, North Carolina, North Dakota | Other Delaware, Georgia, Illinois |
|---|
Who has a duty to warn?
Duty to warn refers to the responsibility of
a counselor or therapist to inform third parties or authorities
if a client poses a threat to themselves or another identifiable individual. 1 It is one of just a few instances where a therapist can breach client confidentiality.
What is the difference between duty to warn and duty protect?
The duty to warn refers to a counselor’s obligation to warn identifiable victims. The duty to protect is a
counselor’s duty to reveal confidential client information in the event that the counselor has reason to believe that a third party may be harmed
.
Does Tarasoff apply to property?
While some jurisdictions have ruled that threats to property are covered under Tarasoff laws,
other jurisdictions have not
.
Is duty to warn a federal law?
With some exceptions codified in state and federal law, health professionals can be
legally
liable for breaching confidentiality. … This case triggered passage of “duty to warn” or “duty to protect” laws in almost every state as summarized in the map and, in more detail, in the chart below. Opinions about the laws vary.
What is Tarasoff II?
Regents of the University of California (Tarasoff II)
imposed upon psychotherapists in California a legal duty to protect third parties from harmful acts perpetrated by their patients
, even if the protective intervention requires a breach of the patient’s confidentiality.
Should a psychiatrist report the content of a therapy session to the police if he or she believes that it indicates that a patient is a threat to the public?
A therapist may be forced to report information disclosed by the patient if a patient reveals their intent to harm someone else. … “If a therapist is aware or believes that someone is going to do something like that, they will need to report.
What is an example of countertransference?
Examples of Countertransference
For example,
a therapist may meet with a person who has extreme difficulty making conversation
. The therapist may begin, unwittingly, to lead the conversation and provide additional prompts to the person in treatment to encourage discussion.
Which of the following is true concerning dual relationships?
The following is true concerning dual relationships:
Counselors need to make every effort to avoid dual relationships with clients that could impair professional judgment
or increase the risk of harm to clients.
