Explanation: Manipulation of a crop has several unanticipated consequences; such that the new crop may require more water,
it may harm the environment
and its yield may be limited. More water might be required for the crops to grow and the yield declined.
How might environmental manipulation of a crop have unexpected consequences a the new crop may require more water than the original?
How might environmental manipulation of a crop have unexpected consequences? … The new crop may require more water than the original,
the new crop may harm the environment
, and the yield may be reduced. You just studied 140 terms!
What is meant by the unexpected consequences of environmental manipulation?
A. What is meant by the unexpected consequences of environmental manipulation? … Specifically, unexpected consequences can
refer to consequences that were not intended to occur as a result of the environmental manipulation.
When animals feed off of land faster than the plants can regrow?
When animals feed off of land faster than the plants can regrow,
the land is depleted
.
What is a possible effect of long-term environmental changes?
Scientists have predicted that long-term effects of climate change will include a
decrease in sea ice
and an increase in permafrost thawing, an increase in heat waves and heavy precipitation, and decreased water resources in semi-arid regions.
Which of the following is the most likely result from clearing mature?
Which of the following is the most likely result from clearing mature, forested land and converting it into agricultural land that would be used for cattle grazing?
reduction in the uptake of atmospheric carbon dioxide
.
What is the most likely effect of clearcutting a forest?
“Clear-cutting forests has an
effect of mobilizing the carbon
, making it more likely to leave the soil and end up in the atmosphere,” says senior author Andrew Friedland, a professor of environmental studies.
How do national parks reduce the human impact on land?
Explanation: National parks reduce the human impact on land by
“preventing companies from polluting on public lands
.”
Which of the following best explains why clearcutting forest is more destructive than selectively cutting down trees in a forest?
Which of the following best explains why clear-cutting forests is more destructive than selectively cutting down trees in forests? …
Clear-cutting causes less soil erosion than selective cutting
.
What are three examples of long term environmental changes?
Terms in this set (6) A long-term environmental change is…
ice age, deforestation, urbanization, Earth’s orbit, Sun’s intensity, global Warming, radioactive waste/pollution
. A short-term environmental change is drought, smog, flooding, volcanic eruption, blizzards, and pollution.
What is the difference between long term and short-term environmental changes?
Long-term environmental changes
occur slowly over time
, affect organisms over many generations, and in many cases the organisms have time to adapt. Short-term environmental changes occur quickly, affect organisms immediately, and the organisms do not have time to adapt and are forced to move or they will die.
What are some long term changes?
ice age, deforestation, urbanization, Earth’s orbit, Sun’s intensity, global Warming, radioactive waste/pollution
. Extinction of species could happen to anyone of the food webs in a long term change.
Which of the following is a threat to forest ecosystems?
Forest ecosystems in the South are facing increased threats from factors such as invasive plants and animals, native insects and disease,
wildfire, climate change, urbanization and forest fragmentation
.
What is one way a forest is economically valuable?
A forest is ecologically valuable for animals or organisms as they serve as natural habitats for them while a forest may be economically valuable for those business are
in line with timber
, or those business which profit from the animals living in forests.
What is the process of clear cutting?
Clear-cutting is
a method of harvesting and regenerating trees in which all trees are cleared from a site and a new, even-age stand of timber is grown
. … Many conservation and citizen groups object to clear-cutting any forest, citing soil and water degradation, unsightly landscapes, and other damages.
What are the pros and cons of clear cutting?
- Pro: Financial Reasons. Clearcutting advocates argue that the method is the most efficient for both harvesting and replanting trees. …
- Con: Effects on Plant and Wildlife. …
- Pro: Increased Water Flow. …
- Con: Loss of Recreation Land. …
- Pro: Increased Farmland.
