Under What Circumstances Can Experimenters Justify The Use Of Deception? (a) Psychologists do not conduct a study involving deception unless they have determined that the use of deceptive techniques is justified by the study’s significant prospective scientific, educational, or applied value and that effective nondeceptive alternative procedures are not feasible. When can experimenters justify the
Is The Journal Of Medical Ethics Peer Reviewed? Journal of Medical Ethics operates double-blind peer review which requires authors to submit an anonymous version of their manuscript file (to be uploaded as the Manuscript File including abstract): Is the Online journal of health Ethics peer-reviewed? The Journal of Health Ethics is an open access, peer-reviewed
What Did The Lead Researcher Fail To Do In The Stanford Prison Experiment? What did the lead researcher fail to do in the Stanford Prison experiment? … He failed to adequately separate his psychological duties from his experimental role. What ethical principles were violated in the Stanford Prison Experiment? The Stanford Prison Experiment would not
Which Research Misconduct Most Likely Occurred? Which type of research misconduct most likely occurred if someone intentionally removes data points from the data set in order to generate a deceptive conclusion? This situation most likely involves falsification. Falsification includes deceptively changing or omitting data. Which type of research misconduct most likely occurred if someone intentionally
Do You Need Consent For Naturalistic Observation? Do you need consent for naturalistic observation? This is much less regulated in naturalistic studies, although they offer no or at best minor individual benefit but potentially considerable risks, eg, with unexpected incidental findings. Therefore, the basic precondition for research with human beings is their voluntary and valid
Do Scientists Have Ethical Responsibilities? Do scientists have ethical responsibilities? Scientists, like all professionals, have ethical responsibilities at three levels: First, scientists must assume personal responsibility for the integrity of their research, their relations with colleagues and subordinates, and their role as representatives of their home institutions. Do scientists have to be ethical? Ethics is